When strangers pass: processing of mutual and averted social gaze in the superior temporal sulcus.
Abstract
Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated brain activity
evoked by mutual and averted gaze in a compelling and commonly experienced social
encounter. Through virtual-reality goggles, subjects viewed a man who walked toward
them and shifted his neutral gaze either toward (mutual gaze) or away (averted gaze)
from them. Robust activity was evoked in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and fusiform
gyrus (FFG). For both conditions, STS activity was strongly right lateralized. Mutual
gaze evoked greater activity in the STS than did averted gaze, whereas the FFG responded
equivalently to mutual and averted gaze. Thus, we show that the STS is involved in
processing social information conveyed by shifts in gaze within an overtly social
context. This study extends understanding of the role of the STS in social cognition
and social perception by demonstrating that it is highly sensitive to the context
in which a human action occurs.
Type
Journal articleSubject
ChildCues
Fixation, Ocular
Functional Laterality
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Social Behavior
Temporal Lobe
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/7354Published Version (Please cite this version)
10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00726.xPublication Info
Pelphrey, Kevin A; Viola, Ronald J; & McCarthy, Gregory (2004). When strangers pass: processing of mutual and averted social gaze in the superior
temporal sulcus. Psychol Sci, 15(9). pp. 598-603. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00726.x. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/7354.This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this
article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
More Info
Show full item record
Articles written by Duke faculty are made available through the campus open access policy. For more information see: Duke Open Access Policy
Rights for Collection: Scholarly Articles
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info