Case Study: The Axel Patents-A Case Study in University-Technology Transfer
Abstract
The Axel Patents are among the most lucrative university patents in history, earning
$790 million in royalty revenues for Columbia University. This paper tells the story
of the Axel Patents, from the initial scientific discovery, through the decision to
patent, to the non-exclusive licensing strategies Columbia used to spread the technology,
the measures Columbia took to extend the life of the patents, and the controversy
that erupted when another patent was issued in 2002. Columbia plowed most of the revenues
back into research, including Richard Axel's work that earned him a Nobel Prize. Columbia's
aggressive pursuit of extended patent duration, however, also led it to considerable
legal expenditures that have proven fruitless to date, and brought criticism for behavior
unbecoming a nonprofit academic institution. This case study showcases a highly successful
example of university entrepreneurship, and provides a cautionary tale of an attempted
patent extension.
Description
Full text of a case study report of Columbia U axel patents. Written by A. Colaianni
(2007) and submitted to a journal. (.doc, one doc, 28 pages)
Type
ReportPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8111Citation
Colaianni, Alessandra (2013). Case Study: The Axel Patents-A Case Study in University-Technology Transfer. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8111.Collections
More Info
Show full item recordWorks are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info