Improving Access to Healthy Food in Durham’s Food Deserts: A Policy Analysis
Abstract
The USDA categorizes food deserts as low-income census tracts with poor access to
fresh produce. This lack of access to healthy food has been linked to public health
problems such as obesity, diabetes, strokes, and cardiovascular diseases, leading
to higher disease rates, health bills, and mortality rates within food deserts. Today
in Durham, over 43,200 residents live in food deserts; this is 16.2% of the county
population, and 16,800 more people than in 2012. To address the growing food desert
problem in Durham, this report will develop a set of policies detailing how the city
government along with private businesses can improve food access. The policies considered
will target ways to improve access, specifically to locally sourced produce, in order
to promote local agriculture and businesses as well. Furthermore, the policies will
focus on short-term access and only those that do not overlap with federal food desert
policy. Four policies will be analyzed: (1) the status quo, (2) added benefits to
Electronic Benefit Transfer (food stamps) and Women, Infants, and Children benefits
for shopping at local markets, (3) establishing new farmers’ markets in food deserts,
and (4) establishing mobile markets operating in food deserts. They were developed
based on case studies of other municipal actions to improve food access, and interviews
with local stakeholders to apply them to Durham. Each policy will be analyzed based
on its expected costs and benefits, its political feasibility and actors required
for implementation, equity concerns, and the policy’s improvability and adaptability.
Type
Master's projectPermalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8545Citation
Tucker, Dylan (2014). Improving Access to Healthy Food in Durham’s Food Deserts: A Policy Analysis. Master's project, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/8545.Collections
More Info
Show full item record
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Rights for Collection: Nicholas School of the Environment
Works are deposited here by their authors, and represent their research and opinions, not that of Duke University. Some materials and descriptions may include offensive content. More info