Combating resistance: The case for a global antibiotics treaty
Repository Usage Stats
The use of antibiotics by one person can profoundly affect the welfare of other people. I will argue that efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance generate a global collective action problem that only a well-designed international treaty can overcome. I begin by describing the problem of resistance and outlining some market-friendly policy tools that participants in a global treaty could use to control the problem. I then defend the claim that these policies can achieve their aim while protecting individual liberty and state autonomy. Finally, I offer some suggestions for a treaty, drawing lessons from the failure of the Kyoto Protocol on climate change and the success of the Montreal Protocol on ozone depletion. © 2010 The Author.
Published Version (Please cite this version)10.1093/phe/phq001
Publication InfoAnomaly, J (2010). Combating resistance: The case for a global antibiotics treaty. Public Health Ethics, 3(1). pp. 13-22. 10.1093/phe/phq001. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/9148.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
More InfoShow full item record
Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science
I work mostly on issues at the intersection of ethics and economics, including how we should respond to the under-consumption of vaccines and the over-consumption of antibiotics, and whether the market for biomedical enhancements should be regulated in any way. More generally, my research focuses on collective action problems. I recently co-edited the first major <a href="https://global.oup.com/academic/product/philosophy-politics-and-economics-9780190207311?cc=us&lang=en&a
This author no longer has a Scholars@Duke profile, so the information shown here reflects their Duke status at the time this item was deposited.