Does Velocity of Return-to-Work Differ between Circumferential Minimally-Invasive and Open Surgery to Treat Adult Spinal Deformity?

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective matched cohort study.

Objective

We sought to compare circumferential minimally-invasive surgery (cMIS) to open deformity correction surgery on patients' timing of return to work.

Summary of background data

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) impacts functional ability and quality of life, often influencing patients' ability to work. Surgical correction can improve alignment and symptoms; however, recovery timelines may vary depending on surgical technique.

Methods

Prospectively collected data from the International Spine Study Group (ISSG) multicenter database was queried for ASD correction. Patients were evaluated in two cohorts: cMIS or open surgery. Propensity scoring matched age, body mass index, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis. All patients had at least 2 year follow-up. The cohorts were compared at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years.

Results

Of 173 matched patients (85 open, 88 cMIS), there were no significant differences in age, gender, or ASA classification. Average age was 68.2 years with ≥3 levels fused. The open group had significantly more direct posterior decompressions, higher median number of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions, longer surgery time, greater blood loss, and longer hospital stay. The cMIS group had a higher median number of lateral lumbar interbody fusions. Baseline work status did not differ significantly: disabled (4.7% vs. 6.8%), working(20.0% vs. 21.5%), retired (71.7% vs. 67.0%), not working (3.5% vs. 4.5%). At 6 weeks, working patients were similar (14.1% vs. 15.9%, P=0.741); at 1 year, significantly more cMIS patients returned to work (10.5% vs. 21.5%, P=0.049). At 2 years, more cMIS patients had returned to work (14.1% vs. 19.3%), but this was not significant (P=0.277).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing cMIS surgery returned to work at a higher rate between 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. At 2 years, return-to-work remained higher for cMIS but this difference was no longer statistically significant.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

International Spine Study Group

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1097/brs.0000000000005519

Publication Info

Macki, Mohamed, Michael E Tawil, Nima Alan, Nathan Han, Marc Prablek, Vivian P Le, Alexander Aabedi, Paul Park, et al. (2025). Does Velocity of Return-to-Work Differ between Circumferential Minimally-Invasive and Open Surgery to Treat Adult Spinal Deformity?. Spine. 10.1097/brs.0000000000005519 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/33275.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.