Is baseline Neck Disability Index a predictor of 5-year postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is an important outcome to measure quality of care. The hypothesis of this study was that more severe baseline neck disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI] scores 70-100) is associated with less frequent postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. This study used the 14-site Spine CORe™ study group's cervical dataset module from the Quality Outcomes Database, which included 1085 patients. Baseline demographics, clinical variables, and surgical parameters were collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected include EQ-5D, NDI, and numeric rating scale for neck pain and arm pain scores. Heat maps were created to demonstrate the association of NDI scores with postoperative satisfaction. There were 1085 patients in this study with a 5-year follow-up rate of 83% for the NDI. PROs significantly improved 1 and 5 years postoperatively. Multivariate regression models found baseline NDI scores to be associated with 1- and 5-year satisfaction (OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.97-0.99], p = 0.004). Heat maps were created to determine the significance of baseline, 1-year, and 5-year NDI scores on satisfaction rates. The level of satisfaction decreased with increasing 1- and 5-year NDI scores. Additionally, patients with higher baseline NDI scores required a more significant change in NDI to achieve satisfaction with surgery. Patients with more severe disability measured by the NDI require a greater change in postoperative NDI scores to meet satisfaction. Despite the importance of postoperative satisfaction, failure to achieve satisfaction should not be assumed to be due to lack of clinical benefit. Discussing a patient's goals and expectations preoperatively is essential to maximize the probability of achieving satisfaction.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Cervical Vertebrae, Humans, Spinal Cord Diseases, Neck Pain, Disability Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Follow-Up Studies, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Female, Male, Spondylosis, Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3171/2025.12.focus25944

Publication Info

Zeitouni, Daniel, Izza Tahir, Irina-Mihaela Matache, Hendrik von Kentzinsky, Erica F Bisson, Eric A Potts, Vincent J Alentado, Kevin T Foley, et al. (2026). Is baseline Neck Disability Index a predictor of 5-year postoperative satisfaction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data. Neurosurgical focus, 60(5). p. E12. 10.3171/2025.12.focus25944 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34634.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.

Gottfried

Oren N Gottfried

Professor of Neurosurgery

I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. I have a special interest in the treatment of thoracolumbar deformities, occipital-cervical problems, and in helping patients with complex spinal issues from previously unsuccessful surgery or recurrent disease.I listen to my patients to understand their symptoms and experiences so I can provide them with the information and education they need to manage their disease. I make sure my patients understand their treatment options, and what will work best for their individual condition. I treat all my patients with care and concern – just as I would treat my family. I am available to address my patients' concerns before and after surgery.  I aim to improve surgical outcomes for my patients and care of all spine patients with active research evaluating clinical and radiological results after spine surgery with multiple prospective databases. I am particularly interested in prevention of spinal deformity, infections, complications, and recurrent spinal disease. Also, I study whether patient specific variables including pelvic/sacral anatomy and sagittal spinal balance predict complications from spine surgery.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.