Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value.
dc.contributor.author | Justus, James | |
dc.contributor.author | Colyvan, Mark | |
dc.contributor.author | Regan, Helen | |
dc.contributor.author | Maguire, Lynn | |
dc.coverage.spatial | England | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-04T17:47:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-04T17:47:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many conservation biologists believe the best ethical basis for conserving natural entities is their claimed intrinsic value, not their instrumental value for humans. But there is significant confusion about what intrinsic value is and how it could govern conservation decision making. After examining what intrinsic value is supposed to be, we argue that it cannot guide the decision making conservation requires. An adequate ethical basis for conservation must do this, and instrumental value does it best. | |
dc.identifier | ||
dc.identifier | S0169-5347(09)00049-4 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0169-5347 | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Trends Ecol Evol | |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.011 | |
dc.subject | Conservation of Natural Resources | |
dc.subject | Decision Making | |
dc.subject | Ethics | |
dc.title | Buying into conservation: intrinsic versus instrumental value. | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
pubs.author-url | ||
pubs.begin-page | 187 | |
pubs.end-page | 191 | |
pubs.issue | 4 | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke | |
pubs.organisational-group | Duke Science & Society | |
pubs.organisational-group | Environmental Sciences and Policy | |
pubs.organisational-group | Initiatives | |
pubs.organisational-group | Institutes and Provost's Academic Units | |
pubs.organisational-group | Nicholas School of the Environment | |
pubs.publication-status | Published | |
pubs.volume | 24 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- TREE1061.pdf
- Size:
- 333.69 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Published version