How much do patients benefit in quality of life after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.

Abstract

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the leading cause of spinal cord dysfunction, leading to worsening disability and poor quality of life. The long-term benefits of surgery for patient quality of life remain incompletely defined. Given the current emphasis on value-based care, this study aimed to identify 1) how surgery improves quality of life and 2) what factors are associated with quality of life improvement in patients operated on for CSM. The Spine CORe™ study group performed a post hoc analysis of the prospectively collected, 14-site Quality Outcomes Database CSM cohort. The primary outcome was the 5-dimension EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) score, assessed at baseline and at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months postoperatively. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the EQ-5D score was defined as 0.11. A multivariable logistic model was used to identify preoperative factors associated with the MCID for the 60-month EQ-5D score, controlling for variables reaching a p value < 0.20 on univariate analysis. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were also calculated using the area under the curve method, with baseline projected QALYs subtracted from observed values. At 60 months, follow-up status was available for 895 of 1085 patients (82.4%). A total of 788 patients had EQ-5D scores recorded at 60 months for inclusion in the initial phase of this analysis. The mean EQ-5D score improved significantly from 0.58 ± 0.22 at baseline to 0.76 ± 0.22 at 60 months (p < 0.001), with gains evident by 3 months and sustained through all subsequent follow-up intervals. At 60 months, 58.7% of patients achieved the EQ-5D MCID. Multivariable analysis identified greater baseline numeric rating scale neck pain score and use of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) as independent predictors of decreased odds of MCID achievement (p < 0.05). Conversely, lower baseline EQ-5D scores, corresponding to worse quality of life, were associated with increased odds of improvement (p < 0.05). The authors further found in the full cohort of patients that there was a mean QALY gain of 0.72 ± 1.11 following surgery. Patients undergoing surgery for CSM experience significant and durable postoperative improvements in their quality of life, with notable gains of 0.72 QALYs achieved 5 years after surgery. Additionally, more than 50% of patients achieve a clinically meaningful benefit in EQ-5D score at 5 years. Greater baseline neck pain severity and ACCF were associated with reduced odds of achieving the MCID, whereas worse baseline quality of life was associated with greater odds of achieving long-term improvement. Overall, these findings confirm that surgery for CSM yields sustained quality of life benefits for the majority of patients.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Cervical Vertebrae, Humans, Spinal Cord Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Cohort Studies, Prospective Studies, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Quality of Life, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male, Spondylosis, Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3171/2025.12.focus25928

Publication Info

Englander, Zachary, Vardhaan S Ambati, Eunice Yang, Praveen V Mummaneni, Dean Chou, Mohamad Bydon, Erica F Bisson, Christopher I Shaffrey, et al. (2026). How much do patients benefit in quality of life after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data. Neurosurgical focus, 60(5). p. E2. 10.3171/2025.12.focus25928 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34635.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.

Gottfried

Oren N Gottfried

Professor of Neurosurgery

I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. I have a special interest in the treatment of thoracolumbar deformities, occipital-cervical problems, and in helping patients with complex spinal issues from previously unsuccessful surgery or recurrent disease.I listen to my patients to understand their symptoms and experiences so I can provide them with the information and education they need to manage their disease. I make sure my patients understand their treatment options, and what will work best for their individual condition. I treat all my patients with care and concern – just as I would treat my family. I am available to address my patients' concerns before and after surgery.  I aim to improve surgical outcomes for my patients and care of all spine patients with active research evaluating clinical and radiological results after spine surgery with multiple prospective databases. I am particularly interested in prevention of spinal deformity, infections, complications, and recurrent spinal disease. Also, I study whether patient specific variables including pelvic/sacral anatomy and sagittal spinal balance predict complications from spine surgery.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.