Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Patrick J

dc.contributor.author

Blumenthal, James A

dc.contributor.author

Hoffman, Benson M

dc.contributor.author

Cooper, Harris

dc.contributor.author

Strauman, Timothy A

dc.contributor.author

Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen

dc.contributor.author

Browndyke, Jeffrey N

dc.contributor.author

Sherwood, Andrew

dc.coverage.spatial

United States

dc.date.accessioned

2017-03-16T22:38:22Z

dc.date.available

2017-03-16T22:38:22Z

dc.date.issued

2010-04

dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance. Although the effects of exercise on neurocognition have been the subject of several previous reviews and meta-analyses, they have been hampered by methodological shortcomings and are now outdated as a result of the recent publication of several large-scale, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of RCTs examining the association between aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance between January 1966 and July 2009. Suitable studies were selected for inclusion according to the following criteria: randomized treatment allocation; mean age > or =18 years of age; duration of treatment >1 month; incorporated aerobic exercise components; supervised exercise training; the presence of a nonaerobic-exercise control group; and sufficient information to derive effect size data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and were included in our analyses, representing data from 2049 participants and 234 effect sizes. Individuals randomly assigned to receive aerobic exercise training demonstrated modest improvements in attention and processing speed (g = 0.158; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.055-0.260; p = .003), executive function (g = 0.123; 95% CI, 0.021-0.225; p = .018), and memory (g = 0.128; 95% CI, 0.015-0.241; p = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Aerobic exercise training is associated with modest improvements in attention and processing speed, executive function, and memory, although the effects of exercise on working memory are less consistent. Rigorous RCTs are needed with larger samples, appropriate controls, and longer follow-up periods.

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20223924

dc.identifier

PSY.0b013e3181d14633

dc.identifier.eissn

1534-7796

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13857

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Psychosom Med

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d14633

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Age Factors

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Aged, 80 and over

dc.subject

Attention

dc.subject

Cognition

dc.subject

Cognition Disorders

dc.subject

Executive Function

dc.subject

Exercise

dc.subject

Exercise Therapy

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Memory

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Neuropsychological Tests

dc.subject

Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.title

Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Smith, Patrick J|0000-0002-6374-0298

duke.contributor.orcid

Blumenthal, James A|0000-0003-3789-0935

duke.contributor.orcid

Cooper, Harris|0000-0001-8021-6079

duke.contributor.orcid

Welsh-Bohmer, Kathleen|0000-0003-1824-0179

duke.contributor.orcid

Browndyke, Jeffrey N|0000-0002-8573-7073

duke.contributor.orcid

Sherwood, Andrew|0000-0001-9067-185X

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20223924

pubs.begin-page

239

pubs.end-page

252

pubs.issue

3

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-UNC Center for Brain Imaging and Analysis

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Neurology

pubs.organisational-group

Neurology, Behavioral Neurology

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Geriatric Behavioral Health

pubs.organisational-group

Psychology and Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

72

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2010 Smith et al Psychosomatic Medicine article.pdf
Size:
550.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format