Biased experts, majority rule, and the optimal composition of committee

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2021-05-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

23
views
56
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

An uninformed principal appoints a committee of experts to vote on a multi-attribute alternative, such as an interdisciplinary project. Each expert evaluates one attribute and is biased toward it (specialty bias). The principal values all attributes equally but has a status quo bias, reflecting the organizational cost of a change. We study whether the principal would compose the committee of more or less specialty-biased experts. We show that her optimal composition is nonmonotonic in the majority rule, with the most biased experts appointed under intermediate rules. We then show that the principal would be less concerned about the committee composition if its members can be uninformed, as they induce the informed to vote less strategically. Surprisingly, although uninformed members lower the quality of the committee's decision, the principal may prefer to have some when its composition is suboptimal, and the majority rule is sufficiently extreme, such as the unanimity.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1016/j.geb.2021.01.010

Publication Info

Name Correa, AJ, and H Yildirim (2021). Biased experts, majority rule, and the optimal composition of committee. Games and Economic Behavior, 127(268). pp. 1–27. 10.1016/j.geb.2021.01.010 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24279.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.