Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters.

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Isaac D

dc.contributor.author

Coles, Theresa M

dc.contributor.author

Howe, Catherine

dc.contributor.author

Overton, Robert

dc.contributor.author

Economou-Zavlanos, Nicoleta

dc.contributor.author

Solomon, Mary J

dc.contributor.author

Zhao, Rong

dc.contributor.author

Adagarla, Bhargav

dc.contributor.author

Doss, Jayanth

dc.contributor.author

Henao, Ricardo

dc.contributor.author

Clowse, Megan EB

dc.contributor.author

Leverenz, David L

dc.date.accessioned

2022-08-30T20:06:41Z

dc.date.available

2022-08-30T20:06:41Z

dc.date.issued

2022-07-19

dc.date.updated

2022-08-30T20:06:40Z

dc.description.abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel scoring system, the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY), to assess provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in rheumatology encounters.

Methods

The EASY scoring system prompts providers to rate their own encounters as follows: in-person or telehealth acceptable, EASY = 1; in-person preferred, EASY = 2; or telehealth preferred, EASY = 3. Assessment of the EASY scoring system occurred at a single academic institution from January 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021. Data were collected in three rounds: 1) initial survey (31 providers) assessing EASY responsiveness to five hypothetical scenarios, 2) follow-up survey (34 providers) exploring EASY responsiveness to 11 scenario modifications, and 3) assessment of EASYs documented in clinic care.

Results

The initial and follow-up surveys demonstrated responsiveness of EASYs to different clinical and nonclinical factors. For instance, less than 20% of providers accepted telehealth when starting a biologic for active rheumatoid arthritis, although more than 35% accepted telehealth in the same scenario if the patient lived far away or was well known to the provider. Regarding EASY documentation, 27 providers provided EASYs for 12,381 encounters. According to these scores, telehealth was acceptable or preferred for 29.7% of all encounters, including 21.4% of in-person encounters. Conversely, 24.4% of telehealth encounters were scored as in-person preferred.

Conclusion

EASY is simple, understandable, and responsive to changes in the clinical scenario. We have successfully accumulated 12,381 EASYs that can be studied in future work to better understand telehealth utility and optimize telehealth triage.
dc.identifier.issn

2578-5745

dc.identifier.issn

2578-5745

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25618

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

ACR open rheumatology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1002/acr2.11470

dc.title

Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Smith, Isaac D|0000-0003-3313-4825

duke.contributor.orcid

Coles, Theresa M|0000-0003-2941-8999

duke.contributor.orcid

Clowse, Megan EB|0000-0002-8579-3470

duke.contributor.orcid

Leverenz, David L|0000-0002-2415-0690

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Rheumatology and Immunology

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ACR Open Rheumatology - 2022 - Smith - Telehealth Made EASY Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth.pdf
Size:
691.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version