Terminating links between emission trading programs

dc.contributor.author

Pizer, WA

dc.contributor.author

Yates, AJ

dc.date.accessioned

2015-07-12T12:38:21Z

dc.date.issued

2015-05-01

dc.description.abstract

© 2015 Elsevier Inc.Links between emission trading programs are not immutable, as highlighted by New Jersey's exit from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in 2011. This raises the question of what to do with existing permits that are banked for future use-choices that have consequences for market behavior in advance of, or upon speculation about, delinking. We consider two delinking policies. One differentiates banked permits by origin, the other treats banked permits the same. We describe the price behavior and relative cost-effectiveness of each policy. Treating permits differently generally leads to higher costs, and may lead to price divergence, even with only speculation about delinking.

dc.identifier.eissn

1096-0449

dc.identifier.issn

0095-0696

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/10258

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.jeem.2015.03.003

dc.title

Terminating links between emission trading programs

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

142

pubs.end-page

159

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Economics

pubs.organisational-group

Environmental Sciences and Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

71

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
linking.pdf
Size:
366.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version