Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database: clinical article.

dc.contributor.author

Scheer, Justin K

dc.contributor.author

Tang, Jessica A

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Klineberg, Eric

dc.contributor.author

Hart, Robert A

dc.contributor.author

Mundis, Gregory M

dc.contributor.author

Burton, Douglas C

dc.contributor.author

Hostin, Richard

dc.contributor.author

O'Brien, Michael F

dc.contributor.author

Bess, Shay

dc.contributor.author

Kebaish, Khaled M

dc.contributor.author

Deviren, Vedat

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Schwab, Frank

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher I

dc.contributor.author

Ames, Christopher P

dc.contributor.author

International Spine Study Group

dc.date.accessioned

2023-08-29T23:34:11Z

dc.date.available

2023-08-29T23:34:11Z

dc.date.issued

2013-10

dc.date.updated

2023-08-29T23:34:09Z

dc.description.abstract

Object

Complications and reoperation for surgery to correct adult spinal deformity are not infrequent, and many studies have analyzed the rates and factors that influence the likelihood of reoperation. However, there is a need for more comprehensive analyses of reoperation in adult spinal deformity surgery from a global standpoint, particularly focusing on the 1st year following operation and considering radiographic parameters and the effects of reoperation on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study attempts to determine the prevalence of reoperation following surgery for adult spinal deformity, assess the indications for these reoperations, evaluate for a relation between specific radiographic parameters and the need for reoperation, and determine the potential impact of reoperation on HRQOL measures.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of a prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database collected through the International Spine Study Group. Data collected included age, body mass index, sex, date of surgery, information regarding complications, reoperation dates, length of stay, and operation time. The radiographic parameters assessed were total number of levels instrumented, total number of interbody fusions, C-7 sagittal vertical axis, uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) location, and presence of 3-column osteotomies. The HRQOL assessment included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical component and mental component summary, and SRS-22 scores. Smoking history, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification grades were also collected and assessed for correlation with risk of early reoperation. Various statistical tests were performed for evaluation of specific factors listed above, and the level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Fifty-nine (17%) of a total of 352 patients required reoperation. Forty-four (12.5%) of the reoperations occurred within 1 year after the initial surgery, including 17 reoperations (5%) within 30 days. Two hundred sixty-eight patients had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Fifty-three (20%) of these patients had a 3-column osteotomy, and 10 (19%) of these 53 required reoperation within 1 year of the initial procedure. However, 3-column osteotomy was not predictive of reoperation within 1 year, p = 0.5476). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to the distribution of UIV, and UIV did not have a significant effect on reoperation rates. Patients needing reoperation within 1 year had worse ODI and SRS-22 scores measured at 1-year follow-up than patients not requiring operation.

Conclusions

Analysis of data from a large multicenter adult spinal deformity database shows an overall 17% reoperation rate, with a 19% reoperation rate for patients treated with 3-column osteotomy and a 16% reoperation rate for patients not treated with 3-column osteotomy. The most common indications for reoperation included instrumentation complications and radiographic failure. Reoperation significantly affected HRQOL outcomes at 1-year follow-up. The need for reoperation may be minimized by carefully considering spinal alignment, termination of fixation, and type of surgical procedure (presence of osteotomy). Precautions should be taken to avoid malposition or instrumentation (rod) failure.
dc.identifier.issn

1547-5654

dc.identifier.issn

1547-5646

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28821

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3171/2013.7.spine12901

dc.subject

International Spine Study Group

dc.subject

Spine

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Spinal Curvatures

dc.subject

Radiography

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Spinal Fusion

dc.subject

Reoperation

dc.subject

Risk Factors

dc.subject

Prospective Studies

dc.subject

Health Status

dc.subject

Quality of Life

dc.subject

Databases, Factual

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Aged, 80 and over

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.title

Reoperation rates and impact on outcome in a large, prospective, multicenter, adult spinal deformity database: clinical article.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher I|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

464

pubs.end-page

470

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

19

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
j-neurosurg-spine-article-p464.pdf
Size:
3.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format