Lower limb compensation in adult spinal deformity: can we identify different patterns?
Date
2026-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Objective
Lower limbs can play a major compensating role for sagittal malalignment; however, little is known about the different types of compensation. This study aimed to identify different patterns of lower limb compensation and to determine which parameters may affect the recruitment of knee flexion versus hip extension.Methods
This study included adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with full-body X-rays in erect position from a multicentric prospective database. All parameters were measured at baseline: demographics, clinical scores and radiographic parameters: pelvic parameters, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, T1 pelvic angle (TPA), sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KA), ankle dorsi-flexion angle (AA), pelvic shift (PSh), hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) grade. A K-means cluster analysis was conducted to identify patterns of lower limb compensation based on SFA and KA. The optimal number of clusters was determined using the silhouette score. The different parameters were then compared across clusters.Results
871 ASD patients were included, of whom 66.9% were females. Mean age was 62.3±14.6 years, mean BMI was 27.7±5.5 kg.m-2. Four patterns of lower limb compensations were identified: "No compensators", "Recliners" (mainly hip extension), "Squatters" (mainly knee flexion) and "Mixed compensators" (both)."Mixed" and "Squatters" had significantly larger BMI. The proportion of females was the least in the "Squatters" cluster (47.0%) while it was the highest in the "Recliners" group (79.3%) (p<0.001). The proportion of patients with severe hip OA was the lowest in the "Recliners" (38.5%) while it was the highest in the "Squatters" group (71.9%). Knee OA rate was the highest in the"Squatters" group (72.7%). "Mixed compensators" had the greatest PI-LL mismatch (30.4±20.0°) and "No compensators" the lowest (5.3±21.3°). Pelvic incidence values were the highest in "Recliners" and "Mixed compensators" (59.2±13.1° and 57.0±14.1° respectively). TPA values were the highest in the "Mixed compensators" and the lowest in the "No compensators" (33.3±11.7° versus 16.1±11.5°). The "Squatters" presented the significantly poorest values for disability, frailty, and SRS score.Conclusions
Cluster analysis determined four types of lower limb compensation:"Recliners" using only hip extension, "Squatters" using only knee flexion,"Mixed compensators" and "No compensators". Lower limb compensatory mechanisms recruitment is multifactorial and varies with age, sex, BMI, frailty, knee and hip OA, pelvic incidence, and spinal alignment.Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Khalife, Marc, Renaud Lafage, Alan H Daniels, Bassel G Diebo, Jonathan Elysee, Christopher P Ames, Shay R Bess, Douglas C Burton, et al. (2026). Lower limb compensation in adult spinal deformity: can we identify different patterns?. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society. 10.1007/s00586-026-09742-2 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34195.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.
