Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications.

dc.contributor.author

Louie, Philip K

dc.contributor.author

Iyer, Sravisht

dc.contributor.author

Khanna, Krishn

dc.contributor.author

Harada, Garrett K

dc.contributor.author

Khalid, Alina

dc.contributor.author

Gupta, Munish

dc.contributor.author

Burton, Douglas

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Renaud

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Dewald, Christopher J

dc.contributor.author

Schwab, Frank J

dc.contributor.author

Kim, Han Jo

dc.date.accessioned

2023-06-15T17:51:55Z

dc.date.available

2023-06-15T17:51:55Z

dc.date.issued

2022-05

dc.date.updated

2023-06-15T17:51:54Z

dc.description.abstract

Study design

Retrospective case series.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes following revision surgery following Harrington rod instrumentation.

Methods

Patients who underwent revision surgery with a minimum of 1-year follow-up for flatback syndrome following Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were identified from a multicenter dataset. Baseline demographics and intraoperative information were obtained. Preoperative, initial postoperative, and most recent spinopelvic parameters were compared. Postoperative complications and reoperations were subsequently evaluated.

Results

A total of 41 patients met the inclusion criteria with an average follow-up of 27.7 months. Overall, 14 patients (34.1%) underwent a combined anterior-posterior fusion, and 27 (65.9%) underwent an osteotomy for correction. Preoperatively, the most common lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at L3 and L4 (61%), whereas 85% had a LIV to the pelvis after revision. The mean preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis were 23.7° and 89.6 mm. This was corrected to 8.1° and 28.9 mm and maintained to 9.04° and 34.4 mm at latest follow-up. Complications included deep wound infection (12.2%), durotomy (14.6%), implant related failures (14.6%), and temporary neurologic deficits (22.0%). Eight patients underwent further revision surgery at an average of 7.4 months after initial revision.

Conclusions

There are multiple surgical techniques to address symptomatic flatback syndrome in patients with previous Harrington rod instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. At an average of 27.7 months follow-up, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch and C7 sagittal vertical axis can be successfully corrected and maintained. However, complication and reoperation rates remain high.
dc.identifier.issn

2192-5682

dc.identifier.issn

2192-5690

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28019

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Global spine journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/2192568220960759

dc.subject

adjacent segment degeneration

dc.subject

adult spinal deformity

dc.subject

harrington rod instrumentation

dc.subject

revision surgery

dc.title

Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

654

pubs.end-page

662

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

12

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation Radiographic Outcomes and Complications.pdf
Size:
984.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format