Factors associated with long-term deterioration in back pain after surgical treatment for low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis at 2 and 5 years: an evaluation from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis data.

Abstract

Symptomatic, low-grade spondylolisthesis is usually well treated by surgical intervention. While some patients obtain less than optimal improvement, low-grade spondylolisthesis deteriorates in a few patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate what factors predict deterioration in back pain scores after surgical treatment of low-grade spondylolisthesis. The Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) was queried for patients who underwent single-level surgery for management of grade 1 spondylolisthesis, including decompression with fusion and decompression alone. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at baseline and then 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively, including numeric rating scale (NRS) back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol-5D scores. Patients were categorized based on NRS back pain scores compared to baseline as ≥ 0 (improved or no worse) versus < 0 (worsened). These two groups were compared with respect to factors that predicted postoperative deterioration in NRS back pain scores. Of 608 cases enrolled, 369 met inclusion criteria for the 24-month cohort. Three hundred twenty-four patients had improved or stable back pain scores (of whom 79% underwent fusion), while 45 reported worse back pain at 24 months (of whom 49% underwent fusion). In the 60-month cohort (n = 429), 376 had improved or stable back pain scores (of whom 81% underwent fusion), while 53 reported worse back pain (of whom 49% underwent fusion). On multivariate analysis, lower baseline NRS back pain scores were associated with back pain deterioration at both time points. Less ODI improvement at 3 months postoperatively and persistent leg pain at 12 months postoperatively were also associated with ultimate deterioration in back pain scores. Most patients (88%) improved after surgery while deterioration was only reported in a few patients (12%). Patients with better back pain scores at baseline were more likely to report deterioration in back pain scores at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. There also appeared to be a trend toward deterioration in those who underwent decompression alone without fusion. These findings highlight the risks of operating on patients with less severe symptoms, as well as the need to improve the understanding of which patients would benefit from fusion. Persistent leg pain and less ODI improvement were also associated with deterioration in back pain scores.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

back pain, degenerative, deterioration, lumbar spondylolisthesis, lumbar surgery, patient-reported outcomes

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3171/2025.7.spine25248

Publication Info

Croft, Andrew J, Steven D Glassman, Shawn W Adams, Mladen Djurasovic, Andrew K Chan, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, Kevin T Foley, et al. (2025). Factors associated with long-term deterioration in back pain after surgical treatment for low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis at 2 and 5 years: an evaluation from the Quality Outcomes Database spondylolisthesis data. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine. pp. 1–8. 10.3171/2025.7.spine25248 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/33452.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.