Rod Fracture After Apparently Solid Radiographic Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

dc.contributor.author

Daniels, Alan H

dc.contributor.author

DePasse, J Mason

dc.contributor.author

Durand, Wesley

dc.contributor.author

Hamilton, D Kojo

dc.contributor.author

Passias, Peter

dc.contributor.author

Kim, Han Jo

dc.contributor.author

Protopsaltis, Themistocles

dc.contributor.author

Reid, Daniel BC

dc.contributor.author

LaFage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Justin S

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher

dc.contributor.author

Gupta, Munish

dc.contributor.author

Klineberg, Eric

dc.contributor.author

Schwab, Frank

dc.contributor.author

Burton, Doug

dc.contributor.author

Bess, Shay

dc.contributor.author

Ames, Christopher

dc.contributor.author

Hart, Robert A

dc.contributor.author

International Spine Study Group

dc.date.accessioned

2018-10-05T16:17:30Z

dc.date.available

2018-10-05T16:17:30Z

dc.date.issued

2018-09

dc.date.updated

2018-10-05T16:17:27Z

dc.description.abstract

Rod fracture occurs with delayed fusion or pseudarthrosis after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Rod fracture after apparent radiographic fusion has not been previously investigated.Patients with ASD in a multicenter database were assessed for radiographic fusion by a committee of 3 spinal deformity surgeons. Fusions were rated as bilaterally fused (A), unilaterally fused (B), partially fused (C), or not fused (D). Patients with grade A or B fusion and 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with radiographic fusion were evaluated for subsequent rod fracture. Adjusted analyses were conducted with multiple logistic regression, using backwards-variable selection to a threshold of P < 0.2, to assess for associated factors.Of 402 patients with radiographically apparent solid fusion, 9.5% (38) subsequently suffered a broken rod. On multivariate analysis, greater rates of rod fracture were seen among patients of age group 60-69 years (vs. 18-49), body mass index 30-34 and 35+ (vs. <25), stainless-steel rods (vs. titanium), patients with rods ≤5.5 mm (vs. 6.35 mm), and patients with Charlson score 0 (vs. 3+). Of the 38 patients with rod fractures, 18 (47.4%) presented with worsened pain, and 8 (21.1%) required revision at minimum 2-year follow-up.Rod fracture occurred in 9.5% of patients with apparently solid radiographic fusion after ASD surgery. Advanced age, obesity, small diameter rods (5.5 mm), osteotomy, and lower comorbidity burden were significantly associated with rod fracture. Nearly one-half of these patients noted worsening pain, and 21.1% required revision surgery. Instrumentation failure may occur and may be symptomatic even in the setting of apparent fusion on plain radiographs.

dc.identifier

S1878-8750(18)31286-5

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8750

dc.identifier.issn

1878-8769

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17575

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

World neurosurgery

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.071

dc.subject

International Spine Study Group

dc.title

Rod Fracture After Apparently Solid Radiographic Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Passias, Peter|0000-0002-1479-4070|0000-0003-2635-2226

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

e530

pubs.end-page

e537

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedics

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

117

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1878875018312865-main.pdf
Size:
652.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version