What predicts prolonged length of stay after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A QOD CSM study.

Abstract

Objective

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a leading cause of spinal cord dysfunction requiring surgical intervention. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) after CSM surgery is associated with worse outcomes, increased complications, greater financial burden, and inefficient resource utilization. This study aimed to develop machine learning models to predict prolonged LOS after CSM surgery and to improve patient counseling, perioperative optimization, and discharge planning.

Methods

The authors analyzed prospectively collected data from 14 high-accruing Spine CORe™ sites in the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) of adult patients who underwent elective surgery for CSM. Patients with missing data were excluded. Machine learning models were trained to predict prolonged LOS, defined as ≥ 3 days. Models incorporated a wide range of preoperative demographic, clinical, and surgical variables. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis, and significant predictors were extracted from the logistic regression model.

Results

Of the 1141 patients identified as having undergone elective surgery for CSM, 1020 were included. Logistic regression, XGBoost, and random forest models demonstrated excellent performance with mean ± standard deviation AUROC values of 0.88 ± 0.02, 0.89 ± 0.02, and 0.89 ± 0.02, respectively. Prior shoulder surgery (OR 2.33, 95% CI 2.16-2.51, p = 0.04), greater total fused levels (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.83-1.95, p < 0.001), and diabetes (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.66-1.83, p = 0.049) were predictors of prolonged LOS. In contrast, anterior surgical approach (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.12-0.17, p < 0.001), radicular motor deficit (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.45-0.54, p = 0.030), and greater baseline modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.86-0.88, p = 0.007) were associated with a lower likelihood of prolonged LOS. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with radicular motor deficit and prior shoulder surgery differed demographically, clinically, and surgically compared to those without.

Conclusions

In this large cohort of patients operated on for CSM, prior shoulder surgery, greater number of levels fused, and diabetes were significant positive predictors of prolonged LOS, while anterior approach surgery, radicular motor deficit, and higher baseline mJOA scores were predictive of a shorter inpatient stay. Patients with prior shoulder surgery and those with radicular motor deficit may represent distinct and clinically important subgroups within the broader CSM population. Machine learning models demonstrated excellent performance for predicting prolonged LOS from purely preoperative variables. The findings of this study may help enhance preoperative counseling, perioperative care, and resource utilization for CSM surgery.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Quality Outcomes Database, cervical spondylotic myelopathy, degenerative, length of stay, machine learning, quality improvement, spine surgery

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3171/2026.3.spine251066

Publication Info

Howell, Harrison J, Evan F Joiner, Praveen V Mummaneni, Dean Chou, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, Anthony L Asher, Domagoj Coric, et al. (2026). What predicts prolonged length of stay after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A QOD CSM study. Journal of neurosurgery. Spine. pp. 1–10. 10.3171/2026.3.spine251066 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/35544.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.