Intraoperative neuromonitoring has a poor correlation with postoperative neurological deficits in noncord level adult deformity surgery
Date
2024-09-01
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is routinely used during spinal deformity surgery. While it is highly effective at detecting spinal cord level changes, the utility for surgery at a noncord level is less known. The purpose of this study is to evaluate rates of new neural deficits relative to IONM alerts in noncord-level spinal deformity surgery. PURPOSE: In noncord-level spinal deformity surgery, postop neural deficits are incompletely associated with IONM alerts. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of neuromonitoring in detecting and preventing neurological deficits. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective, international, multicenter cohort. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 197 adult patients undergoing spinal deformity surgery at a noncord level. OUTCOME MEASURES: IONM changes defined as loss of amplitude>50% in SSEP or MEP from baseline or sustained EMG activity lasting>10 seconds were recorded. Postoperative new neurological deficits were recorded. Other outcomes measured were baseline demographics, radiographic alignment parameters, events leading to and following IONM alerts. METHODS: Twenty international centers prospectively documented IONM (EMG, SSEP and MEP), demographics, radiographic findings, and surgical events of patients (10-80 years) undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Inclusion criteria: neurologically intact, spinal deformity correction with major Cobb>80° or involving any osteotomy. IONM change was defined as loss of amplitude>50% in SSEP or MEP from baseline or sustained EMG activity lasting>10 seconds. RESULTS: Of 197 patients, 22 (11.2%) had an IONM alert. More patients were undergoing revision surgery during an alert compared to those with no alert (40.9% vs 18.9%, p = 0.026). IONM alerts did not correlate with coronal cobb angle, deformity angular ratio, sagittal vertical axis, or coronal vertical axis. There were a total of 26 alerts in 22 patients - 4 patients (18.2%) had 2 IONM alerts, while the other 18 (81.8%) had 1 alert. MEPs were affected in 21 of 26 alerts (80.8%) and 15 (71.4%) of those were recovered. Isolated MEP changes were seen in 16 of 26 alerts (61.5%). SSEPs were affected in 8 of 26 alerts (30.8%). Isolated SSEP changes were seen in 3 (11.5%). Lastly, EMGs were affected in only 2 (7.7%) and were isolated. Five of 21 MEP alerts (23.8%) were bilateral, whereas 16 (76.2%) were unilateral. The most frequent event preceding an MEP change was an osteotomy in 6 (28.6%) of 21 patients. The most frequent nonsurgical event preceding an MEP alert was technical in 5 (23.8%), followed by systemic (low blood pressure/anemia) and anesthetic in 3 patients each (14.3%). Thirty-three of 197 patients (16.8%) developed a new postop neural deficit. Of these patients, 24 (72.7%) had no IONM alert. In the presence of an IONM alert 9 of 22 (40.9%) had a new neural deficit. IONM alert and development of new neural deficit had a crude negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In noncord-level spinal deformity surgery, IONM alerts occurred in 11.2% of patients, with osteotomy being the most frequent preceding surgical event. A new postop neural deficit was observed in 16.8% of all patients, and in 41% of patients with a IONM alert. A surprisingly high 73% of postop neural deficits occurred in patients who did not have an alert. This highlights the need for further refinement of IONM techniques and alert criteria for noncord-level surgery. FDA Device/Drug Status: This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Kristen Jones
I listen to my patients' goals and concerns to create a treatment strategy that respects each patient's wishes. I focus on every detail of care to help achieve the best possible outcome, with a customized plan for each individual. I communicate in a straightforward manner to help my patients understand their condition and options.
My research focuses on improving the quality and safety of care that patients receive in spine surgery. We are working to develop best practices and care pathways to minimize complications and improve outcomes for patients undergoing complex spine surgery.
Brett Rocos
I joined the team at Duke University Health from London, UK, where I was a Consultant Adult and Paediatric Spine Surgeon at Barts Health NHS Trust and Honorary Consultant Senior Lecturer at Queen Mary University of London. I completed my surgical training in in the South West of the UK and at the University of Toronto, and am fellowship trained in adult spine surgery, paediatric spine surgery, orthopaedic trauma surgery, research and healthcare management.
I am driven to support patients at every stage of their care, from clinic assessment, through surgery to discharge. Making sure that every person, adult, child, family or friend understands what’s wrong, helping them to choose the right treatment for them, and what the recovery will be like is an important priority.
My research activity focusses on finding effective new treatments for spinal disorders and bringing them to patients. Focusing on spinal deformity, I have led investigations in the UK, Canada and the USA, and I sit on the Global AO Knowledge Forum for Deformity and the Research Grants Committee at the Scoliosis Research Society. I have lectured in North America and Europe about the treatment of spine disorders for the Scoliosis Research Society, Global Spine Congress, AO Spine and Eurospine, and I have worked hard to produce research that improves the care for spine patients wherever they live. Lastly, I review for several orthopaedic journals and I am Deputy Editor of the Bone and Joint 360, a leading publication with a global readership.
Material is made available in this collection at the direction of authors according to their understanding of their rights in that material. You may download and use these materials in any manner not prohibited by copyright or other applicable law.