Outcomes and Complications Associated with the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

dc.contributor.author

Baumann, Anthony N

dc.contributor.author

Callaghan, Megan E

dc.contributor.author

Walley, Kempland C

dc.contributor.author

Anastasio, Albert T

dc.contributor.author

Muralidharan, Aditya

dc.contributor.author

Talaski, Grayson

dc.contributor.author

Rocos, Brett

dc.date.accessioned

2024-01-10T14:44:43Z

dc.date.available

2024-01-10T14:44:43Z

dc.date.issued

2023-10

dc.description.abstract

Study design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective

The objective of this study is to examine the impact of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for clinical outcomes and patient safety.

Summary of background data

Endoscopic cervical foraminotomy is a minimally invasive surgical technique emerging in the literature for surgical management of cervical radiculopathy without the use of open incision. The adoption of endoscopic cervical foraminotomy may be hindered by the learning curve, although no review and meta-analysis exists to date on the topic.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from database inception until July 11th, 2023. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, reported outcomes and/or complications for endoscopic cervical spine surgery relevant to the learning curve and had full-text. A random effects meta-analysis was performed for outcomes and complications.

Results

A total of three articles (n=203 patients) were included from 792 articles initially retrieved. The learning curves from four surgeons were examined with a frequency weighted mean 21 procedures until the competency phase. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospitalization length (P=0.669), postoperative recovery room time (P=0.415), intraoperative blood loss (P=0.064), and total complication rates (10.9% vs. 1.2%, P=0.139) between endoscopic cervical foraminotomy procedures performed in the learning phase as compared to the competency phase of the learning curve. There was a significant decrease in operative time from the learning phase to the competency phase (P=0.005).

Conclusion

Competency was achieved on the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy after about 21 procedures. There is no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative recovery room time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication rates between the learning phase and the competency phase of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, noting the relatively small sample size of this study that may underpower this finding.
dc.identifier

00007632-990000000-00494

dc.identifier.issn

0362-2436

dc.identifier.issn

1528-1159

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29682

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Spine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1097/brs.0000000000004859

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.title

Outcomes and Complications Associated with the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Rocos, Brett|0000-0002-0808-5585

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedic Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Outcomes and Complications Associated with the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy_A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (1).pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format