POLLUTANT EMISSIONS REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS FOR HYDROGEN–HYDROCARBON FUELS IN GAS TURBINES

Abstract

Hydrogen (H2) fuel for gas turbines is a promising approach for long duration storage and dispatchable utilization of intermittent renewable power. A major global discussion point, however, is the potential air quality impact of hydrogen combustion associated with nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Indeed, several studies in the combustion literature have reported elevated NOx concentrations in terms of dry ppmv NOx at 15% oxygen (O2) as a fuel’s H2 fraction is increased. Yet, as emphasized in this work, this practice of directly comparing emissions on the basis of dry ppmv at a reference O2 concentration (ppmvdr) is inappropriate across hydrogen and hydrocarbon fuel blends due to differing concentration changes induced by drying and referencing the corresponding exhaust gasses. This paper addresses three distinct approaches for comparing emissions consistently across fuel blends. Furthermore, it presents examples that quantify the differences in the apparent pollutant emissions between each approach and the usual ppmvdr reporting practice across the full range of hydrogen–methane mixture ratios. In the first approach, ppmvdr emissions values are related to their actual volume concentration. Here, our calculations demonstrate that hydrogen and methane flames producing the same true pollutant concentration exhibit a 40% relative difference in ppmvdr values, resulting in a significant potential exaggeration of NOx emissions for high %H2 fuels. However, this concentration-based approach does not account for changes in the volumetric flow rate of exhaust gasses or the slightly different amounts of heat release required to achieve the same flame temperature across fuels. These effects are captured naturally in the second approach, where the emissions are quantified in terms of the emitted mass per unit of heat release. With this cycle-independent approach, our comparative calculations at equal mass-per-heat emission rates reveal 36% higher ppmvdr values for hydrogen flames than methane flames. Finally, the third approach accounts not only for the thermodynamic properties of the mixture, but also for the system’s overall cycle efficiency, which is shown to depend weakly upon the fuel composition. This method quantifies emissions in terms of the emitted mass per unit of useful shaft work output, a metric also used by environmental regulators. Illustrative results within a simulated F-class gas turbine cycle are presented, indicating 39% higher ppmvdr values for hydrogen flames at equal mass-per-work emission rates. Hence, in all of the considered approaches, ppmvdr emissions values are inflated for H2 fuel blends relative to hydrocarbon fuels, making them unsuitable for direct comparisons of emissions among conventional and alternative fuels.