Is There a Patient Profile That Characterizes a Patient With Adult Spinal Deformity as a Candidate for Minimally Invasive Surgery?

dc.contributor.author

Eastlack, Robert K

dc.contributor.author

Mundis, Gregory M

dc.contributor.author

Wang, Michael

dc.contributor.author

Mummaneni, Praveen V

dc.contributor.author

Uribe, Juan

dc.contributor.author

Okonkwo, David

dc.contributor.author

Akbarnia, Behrooz A

dc.contributor.author

Anand, Neel

dc.contributor.author

Kanter, Adam

dc.contributor.author

Park, Paul

dc.contributor.author

Lafage, Virginie

dc.contributor.author

Shaffrey, Christopher

dc.contributor.author

Fessler, Richard

dc.contributor.author

Deviren, Vedat

dc.contributor.author

International Spine Study Group

dc.date.accessioned

2019-12-15T17:06:43Z

dc.date.available

2019-12-15T17:06:43Z

dc.date.issued

2017-10

dc.date.updated

2019-12-15T17:06:41Z

dc.description.abstract

Retrospective review.The goal of this study was to evaluate the baseline characteristics of patients chosen to undergo traditional open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for adult spinal deformity (ASD).A multicenter review of 2 databases including ASD patients treated with surgery. Inclusion criteria were age >45 years, Cobb angle minimum of 20°, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Preoperative radiographic parameters and disability outcome measures were reviewed.A total of 350 patients were identified: 173 OPEN patients and 177 MIS. OPEN patients were significantly younger than MIS patients (61.5 years vs 63.74 years, P = .013). The OPEN group had significantly more females (87% vs 76%, P = .006), but both groups had similar body mass index. Preoperative lumbar Cobb was significantly higher for the OPEN group (34.2°) than for the MIS group (26.0°, P < .001). The mean preoperative Oswestry Disability Index was significantly higher in the MIS group (44.8 in OPEN patients and 49.8 in MIS patients, P < .011). The preoperative Numerical Rating Scale value for back pain was 7.2 in the OPEN group and 6.8 in the MIS group preoperatively, P = .100.Patients chosen for MIS for ASD are slightly older and have smaller coronal deformities than those chosen for open techniques, but they did not have a substantially lesser degree of sagittal malalignment. MIS surgery was most frequently utilized for patients with an sagittal vertical axis under 6 cm and a baseline pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch under 30°.

dc.identifier

10.1177_2192568217716151

dc.identifier.issn

2192-5682

dc.identifier.issn

2192-5690

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19585

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Global spine journal

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/2192568217716151

dc.subject

International Spine Study Group

dc.title

Is There a Patient Profile That Characterizes a Patient With Adult Spinal Deformity as a Candidate for Minimally Invasive Surgery?

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Shaffrey, Christopher|0000-0001-9760-8386

pubs.begin-page

703

pubs.end-page

708

pubs.issue

7

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Orthopaedics

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Neurosurgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

7

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Is There a Patient Profile That Characterizes a Patient With Adult Spinal Deformity as a Candidate for Minimally Invasive Surgery?.pdf
Size:
862.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format