Lessons from Graduate Student Instructors on the Peer Review of Teaching.

Loading...

Date

2009-05-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

10
views
43
downloads

Attention Stats

Abstract

In this qualitative study, we examined a pilot program for graduate student instructors (GSIs) in a peer review of teaching program at Duke University, a medium-sized research university. We noted key elements that participants identified from their experience that may be distinct from models of peer teaching review developed for faculty. These elements include factors that contribute to critical self reflection, such as interdisciplinarity and opportunities to both observe and be observed; modification of specific teaching behaviors; recognition of different teaching models within the discipline; and practical logistical suggestions for developing peer observation and feedback programs for GSIs.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Scholars@Duke

Crumley

Hugh Crumley

Assistant Dean for Academic Affairs

Hugh Crumley is Assistant Dean for Academic Affairs in The Graduate School, where he leads Duke’s portfolio of academic development programs for graduate students. He directs the Certificate in College Teaching (~500 participants annually) and the Preparing Future Faculty program, and oversees research-ethics and TA-training initiatives serving 3,800+ graduate students. His work emphasizes inclusive teaching, digital pedagogy, and peer-learning communities.

Hugh leads Duke’s Advance HE Fellowship pathway and is completing Senior Fellowship (SFHEA). His scholarship focuses on peer observation, graduate-teaching development, and interdisciplinary pedagogy. He has served as a Fulbright reviewer and elected member of the POD Network Board of Directors, and has collaborated with institutions across North America, Europe, and South America.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.