Stabilizer Slicing: Coherent Error Cancellations in Low-Density Parity-Check Stabilizer Codes.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2018-12

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

128
views
77
downloads

Citation Stats

Attention Stats

Abstract

Coherent errors are a dominant noise process in many quantum computing architectures. Unlike stochastic errors, these errors can combine constructively and grow into highly detrimental overrotations. To combat this, we introduce a simple technique for suppressing systematic coherent errors in low-density parity-check stabilizer codes, which we call stabilizer slicing. The essential idea is to slice low-weight stabilizers into two equally weighted Pauli operators and then apply them by rotating in opposite directions, causing their overrotations to interfere destructively on the logical subspace. With access to native gates generated by three-body Hamiltonians, we can completely eliminate purely coherent overrotation errors, and for overrotation noise of 0.99 unitarity we achieve a 135-fold improvement in the logical error rate of surface-17. For more conventional two-body ion trap gates, we observe an 89-fold improvement for Bacon-Shor-13 with purely coherent errors which should be testable in near-term fault-tolerance experiments. This second scheme takes advantage of the prepared gauge degrees of freedom, and to our knowledge is the first example in which the state of the gauge directly affects the robustness of a code's memory. This Letter demonstrates that coherent noise is preferable to stochastic noise within certain code and gate implementations when the coherence is utilized effectively.

Department

Description

Provenance

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1103/physrevlett.121.250502

Publication Info

Debroy, Dripto M, Muyuan Li, Michael Newman and Kenneth R Brown (2018). Stabilizer Slicing: Coherent Error Cancellations in Low-Density Parity-Check Stabilizer Codes. Physical review letters, 121(25). p. 250502. 10.1103/physrevlett.121.250502 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/17910.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.