Individual differences in regulatory focus predict neural response to reward.

dc.contributor.author

Scult, Matthew A

dc.contributor.author

Knodt, Annchen R

dc.contributor.author

Hanson, Jamie L

dc.contributor.author

Ryoo, Minyoung

dc.contributor.author

Adcock, R Alison

dc.contributor.author

Hariri, Ahmad R

dc.contributor.author

Strauman, Timothy J

dc.coverage.spatial

England

dc.date.accessioned

2017-03-16T22:18:49Z

dc.date.available

2017-03-16T22:18:49Z

dc.date.issued

2016-04-30

dc.description.abstract

Although goal pursuit is related to both functioning of the brain's reward circuits and psychological factors, the literatures surrounding these concepts have often been separate. Here, we use the psychological construct of regulatory focus to investigate individual differences in neural response to reward. Regulatory focus theory proposes two motivational orientations for personal goal pursuit: (1) promotion, associated with sensitivity to potential gain, and (2) prevention, associated with sensitivity to potential loss. The monetary incentive delay task was used to manipulate reward circuit function, along with instructional framing corresponding to promotion and prevention in a within-subject design. We observed that the more promotion oriented an individual was, the lower their ventral striatum response to gain cues. Follow-up analyses revealed that greater promotion orientation was associated with decreased ventral striatum response even to no-value cues, suggesting that promotion orientation may be associated with relatively hypoactive reward system function. The findings are also likely to represent an interaction between the cognitive and motivational characteristics of the promotion system with the task demands. Prevention orientation did not correlate with ventral striatum response to gain cues, supporting the discriminant validity of regulatory focus theory. The results highlight a dynamic association between individual differences in self-regulation and reward system function.

dc.identifier

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074863

dc.identifier.eissn

1747-0927

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13837

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Informa UK Limited

dc.relation.ispartof

Soc Neurosci

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1080/17470919.2016.1178170

dc.subject

Reward

dc.subject

fMRI

dc.subject

individual differences

dc.subject

monetary incentive delay

dc.subject

regulatory focus

dc.title

Individual differences in regulatory focus predict neural response to reward.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Scult, Matthew A|0000-0001-5554-8186

duke.contributor.orcid

Adcock, R Alison|0000-0002-7859-5484

duke.contributor.orcid

Strauman, Timothy J|0000-0002-0310-4505

pubs.author-url

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074863

pubs.begin-page

1

pubs.end-page

11

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-UNC Center for Brain Imaging and Analysis

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Neurobiology

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Translational Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Psychology and Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.publication-status

Published online

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016 Scult et al Social Neuroscience article.pdf
Size:
1.53 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format