Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers.

dc.contributor.author

Adair, Kathryn C

dc.contributor.author

Rodriguez-Homs, Larissa G

dc.contributor.author

Masoud, Sabran

dc.contributor.author

Mosca, Paul J

dc.contributor.author

Sexton, J Bryan

dc.date.accessioned

2021-09-01T14:02:50Z

dc.date.available

2021-09-01T14:02:50Z

dc.date.issued

2020-05-14

dc.date.updated

2021-09-01T14:02:49Z

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND:Emotional exhaustion (EE) in health care workers is common and consequentially linked to lower quality of care. Effective interventions to address EE are urgently needed. OBJECTIVE:This randomized single-exposure trial examined the efficacy of a gratitude letter-writing intervention for improving health care workers' well-being. METHODS:A total of 1575 health care workers were randomly assigned to one of two gratitude letter-writing prompts (self- vs other focused) to assess differential efficacy. Assessments of EE, subjective happiness, work-life balance, and tool engagement were collected at baseline and 1-week post intervention. Participants received their EE score at baseline and quartile benchmarking scores. Paired-samples t tests, independent t tests, and correlations explored the efficacy of the intervention. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software assessed the linguistic content of the gratitude letters and associations with well-being. RESULTS:Participants in both conditions showed significant improvements in EE, happiness, and work-life balance between the intervention and 1-week follow-up (P<.001). The self-focused (vs other) instruction conditions did not differentially predict improvement in any of the measures (P=.91). Tool engagement was high, and participants reporting higher motivation to improve their EE had higher EE at baseline (P<.001) and were more likely to improve EE a week later (P=.03). Linguistic analyses revealed that participants high on EE at baseline used more negative emotion words in their letters (P=.005). Reduction in EE at the 1-week follow-up was predicted at the level of a trend by using fewer first-person (P=.06) and positive emotion words (P=.09). No baseline differences were found between those who completed the follow-up assessment and those who did not (Ps>.05). CONCLUSIONS:This single-exposure gratitude letter-writing intervention appears to be a promising low-cost, brief, and meaningful tool to improve the well-being of health care workers.

dc.identifier

v22i5e15562

dc.identifier.issn

1439-4456

dc.identifier.issn

1438-8871

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/23681

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of medical Internet research

dc.relation.isversionof

10.2196/15562

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Cohort Studies

dc.subject

Prospective Studies

dc.subject

Emotions

dc.subject

Internet

dc.subject

Health Personnel

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Psychological Distress

dc.title

Gratitude at Work: Prospective Cohort Study of a Web-Based, Single-Exposure Well-Being Intervention for Health Care Workers.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Adair, Kathryn C|0000-0003-4886-0002

duke.contributor.orcid

Masoud, Sabran|0000-0002-7758-3545

duke.contributor.orcid

Sexton, J Bryan|0000-0002-0578-2924

pubs.begin-page

e15562

pubs.issue

5

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, General Psychiatry

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Surgical Oncology

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

22

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JMIR Gratitude at Work - Adair et al 2020.pdf
Size:
287.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format