Pollutant Emissions Reporting and Performance Considerations for Ammonia-Blended Fuels in Gas Turbines

dc.contributor.author

Douglas, CM

dc.contributor.author

Martz, TD

dc.contributor.author

Steele, RC

dc.contributor.author

Noble, DR

dc.contributor.author

Emerson, BL

dc.contributor.author

Lieuwen, TC

dc.date.accessioned

2025-09-25T02:34:39Z

dc.date.available

2025-09-25T02:34:39Z

dc.date.issued

2023-01-01

dc.description.abstract

To limit climate change and promote energy security, there is widespread interest towards transitioning existing fossil fueled combustion systems to sustainable, alternative fuels such as hydrogen (H2) and ammonia (NH3) without negatively impacting air quality. However, quantifying the emission rate of air pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) is a nuanced process when comparing pollutant emissions across different fuels, as discussed in our paper GT2022-80971 presented last year. That study indicated that the standardized approach for measuring combustion emissions in terms of dry, oxygen-referenced volumetric concentrations (i.e. ppmvdr) inflates reported pollutant emissions by up to 40% for hydrogen combustion relative to natural gas. In this paper, we extend our prior analysis of these so-called “indirect effects” on emissions values to ammonia (NH3) and cracked ammonia (i.e., molecular hydrogen and nitrogen, 3H2 per N2) fuel blends. The results reveal that ppmvdr-based pollutant reporting approaches have a less prominent influence on emissions interpretations for molecular ammonia–methane blends than for hydrogen–methane blends. Nonetheless, we still find that ppmvdr reporting induces up to a 10% relative increase in apparent emissions when comparing 100% NH3 and 100% methane (CH4) fuels at an equal mass-per-work emission rate. Cracking the ammonia is shown to increase this relative bias up to 21% in comparison to a methane system. Further analysis shows how drying, dilution, thermodynamic, and performance effects each influence the relationship between ppmvdr and mass-per-work emissions across the spectrum of fuels and fuel blends. Following discussion of these findings, we conclude that quantifying combustion emissions using ppmvdr is generally inappropriate for emissions comparisons and advise the combustion community to shift towards robust mass-per-energy metrics when quantifying pollutant emissions.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/33235

dc.publisher

American Society of Mechanical Engineers

dc.relation.ispartof

Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1115/gt2023-102554

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Emissions

dc.subject

Regulations

dc.subject

Fuels

dc.title

Pollutant Emissions Reporting and Performance Considerations for Ammonia-Blended Fuels in Gas Turbines

dc.type

Conference

duke.contributor.orcid

Douglas, CM|0000-0002-5968-3315

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Pratt School of Engineering

pubs.organisational-group

Thomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

3A-2023

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023TurboExpo_v2_accepted.pdf
Size:
150.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version