A cost-effective method for reducing soil disturbance-induced errors in static chamber measurement of wetland methane emissions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2016-08-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

107
views
272
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. Static chambers used for sampling methane (CH 4 ) in wetlands are highly sensitive to soil disturbance. Temporary compression around chambers during sampling can inflate the initial chamber CH 4 headspace concentration and/or lead to generation of non-linear, unreliable flux estimates that must be discarded. In this study, we tested an often-used rubber gasket (RG)-sealed static chamber against a water-filled gutter (WFG) seal design that could be set up and sampled from a distance of 2 m with a newly designed remote rod sampling system to reduce soil disturbance. Compared to conventional RG design, our remotely sampled static chambers reduced the chance of detecting inflated initial CH 4 concentrations ( > 3.6 ppm) from 66 to 6 % and nearly doubled the proportion of robust linear regressions (r 2   >  0.9) from 45 to 86 %. Importantly, the remote rod sampling system allows for more accurate and reliable CH 4 sampling without costly boardwalk construction. This paper presents results demonstrating that the remote rod sampling system combined with WFG static chambers improves CH 4 data reliability by reducing initial gas measurement variability due to chamber disturbance when tested on a mineral soil-restored wetland in Charles City County, Virginia, USA.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1007/s11273-015-9468-5

Publication Info

Winton, RS, and CJ Richardson (2016). A cost-effective method for reducing soil disturbance-induced errors in static chamber measurement of wetland methane emissions. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 24(4). pp. 419–425. 10.1007/s11273-015-9468-5 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/15702.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.