Behavioral Engagement and Activation Model Study (BEAMS): A latent class analysis of adopters and non-adopters of digital health technologies among people with Type 2 diabetes.

dc.contributor.author

Piette, John D

dc.contributor.author

Lee, Keni CS

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.contributor.author

Isaacs, Diana

dc.contributor.author

Cerrada, Christian J

dc.contributor.author

Kainkaryam, Raghu

dc.contributor.author

Liska, Jan

dc.contributor.author

Lee, Felix

dc.contributor.author

Kennedy, Adee

dc.contributor.author

Kerr, David

dc.date.accessioned

2024-09-07T15:07:47Z

dc.date.available

2024-09-07T15:07:47Z

dc.date.issued

2024-07

dc.description.abstract

Many people with Type 2 diabetes (T2D) who could benefit from digital health technologies (DHTs) are either not using DHTs or do use them, but not for long enough to reach their behavioral or metabolic goals. We aimed to identify subgroups within DHT adopters and non-adopters and describe their unique profiles to better understand the type of tailored support needed to promote effective and sustained DHT use across a diverse T2D population. We conducted latent class analysis of a sample of adults with T2D who responded to an internet survey between December 2021 and March 2022. We describe the clinical and psychological characteristics of DHT adopters and non-adopters, and their attitudes toward DHTs. A total of 633 individuals were characterized as either DHT "Adopters" (n = 376 reporting any use of DHT) or "Non-Adopters" (n = 257 reporting never using any DHT). Within Adopters, three subgroups were identified: 21% (79/376) were "Self-managing Adopters," who reported high health activation and self-efficacy for diabetes management, 42% (158/376) were "Activated Adopters with dropout risk," and 37% (139/376) were "Non-Activated Adopters with dropout risk." The latter two subgroups reported barriers to using DHTs and lower rates of intended future use. Within Non-Adopters, two subgroups were identified: 31% (79/257) were "Activated Non-Adopters," and 69% (178/257) were "Non-Adopters with barriers," and were similarly distinguished by health activation and barriers to using DHTs. Beyond demographic characteristics, psychological, and clinical factors may help identify different subgroups of Adopters and Non-Adopters.

dc.identifier

7702719

dc.identifier.issn

1869-6716

dc.identifier.issn

1613-9860

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/31465

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

dc.relation.ispartof

Translational behavioral medicine

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1093/tbm/ibae034

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

dc.subject

Health Behavior

dc.subject

Biomedical Technology

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Surveys and Questionnaires

dc.subject

Latent Class Analysis

dc.subject

Digital Technology

dc.subject

Digital Health

dc.title

Behavioral Engagement and Activation Model Study (BEAMS): A latent class analysis of adopters and non-adopters of digital health technologies among people with Type 2 diabetes.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

pubs.begin-page

491

pubs.end-page

498

pubs.issue

8

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

University Initiatives & Academic Support Units

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Innovation & Entrepreneurship

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

14

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Behavioral Engagement and Activation Model Study (BEAMS) A latent class analysis of adopters and non-adopters of digital hea.pdf
Size:
265.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format