Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Aerobic Training and Common Sport-Related Concussion Outcomes in Healthy Participants.

dc.contributor.author

Teel, Elizabeth F

dc.contributor.author

Register-Mihalik, Johna K

dc.contributor.author

Appelbaum, Lawrence Gregory

dc.contributor.author

Battaglini, Claudio L

dc.contributor.author

Carneiro, Kevin A

dc.contributor.author

Guskiewicz, Kevin M

dc.contributor.author

Marshall, Stephen W

dc.contributor.author

Mihalik, Jason P

dc.date.accessioned

2020-06-01T16:21:40Z

dc.date.available

2020-06-01T16:21:40Z

dc.date.issued

2018-12-18

dc.date.updated

2020-06-01T16:21:39Z

dc.description.abstract

CONTEXT:Aerobic exercise interventions are increasingly being prescribed for concussion rehabilitation, but whether aerobic training protocols influence clinical concussion diagnosis and management assessments is unknown. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the effects of a brief aerobic exercise intervention on clinical concussion outcomes in healthy, active participants. DESIGN:Randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING:Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS:Healthy (uninjured) participants (n = 40) who exercised ≥3 times/week. INTERVENTION(S):Participants were randomized into the acute concussion therapy intervention (ACTIVE) training or nontraining group. All participants completed symptom, cognitive, balance, and vision assessments during 2 test sessions approximately 14 days apart. Participants randomized to ACTIVE training completed six 30-minute exercise sessions that progressed from 60% to 80% of individualized maximal oxygen consumption (V˙o2max) across test sessions, while the nontraining group received no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):The CNS Vital Signs standardized scores, Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening near-point convergence distance (cm), and Graded Symptom Checklist, Balance Error Scoring System, and Standardized Assessment of Concussion total scores. RESULTS:An interaction effect was found for total symptom score ( P = .01); the intervention group had improved symptom scores between sessions (session 1: 5.1 ± 5.8; session 2: 1.9 ± 3.6). Cognitive flexibility, executive functioning, reasoning, and total symptom score outcomes were better but composite memory, verbal memory, and near-point convergence distance scores were worse at the second session (all P values < .05). However, few changes exceeded the 80% reliable change indices calculated for this study, and effect sizes were generally small to negligible. CONCLUSIONS:A brief aerobic training protocol had few meaningful effects on clinical concussion assessment in healthy participants, suggesting that current concussion-diagnostic and -assessment tools remain clinically stable in response to aerobic exercise training. This provides normative data for future researchers, who should further evaluate the effect of ACTIVE training on clinical outcomes among concussed populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02872480.

dc.identifier.issn

1938-162X

dc.identifier.issn

1938-162X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/20736

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Journal of Athletic Training/NATA

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of athletic training

dc.relation.isversionof

10.4085/1062-6050-7-18

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Brain Concussion

dc.subject

Athletic Injuries

dc.subject

Exercise Therapy

dc.subject

Memory

dc.subject

Neuropsychological Tests

dc.subject

Oxygen Consumption

dc.subject

Sports

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Young Adult

dc.subject

Healthy Volunteers

dc.title

Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Aerobic Training and Common Sport-Related Concussion Outcomes in Healthy Participants.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Appelbaum, Lawrence Gregory|0000-0002-3184-6725

pubs.begin-page

1156

pubs.end-page

1165

pubs.issue

12

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychology and Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Institute for Brain Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Brain Stimulation and Neurophysiology

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Initiatives

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

53

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018_Teel_etal__ACTIVETraining.pdf
Size:
425.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version