Marginalized and Monitored: Analyzing Reproductive Health and Digital Surveillance in the United States

dc.contributor.advisor

Hoffman, David

dc.contributor.advisor

Dellinger, Jolynn

dc.contributor.author

Proudman, Rachel

dc.date.accessioned

2023-10-19T14:02:22Z

dc.date.available

2023-10-19T14:02:22Z

dc.date.issued

2023-04

dc.department

Sanford School of Public Policy/Public Policy Studies

dc.description.abstract

This thesis delves into the complex and intersectional issues surrounding women’s reproductive rights in the United States, with a specific focus on the impact of restrictive abortion legislation after the overturning of Roe v. Wade in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Supreme Court decision. The research highlights the disproportionate effects of such restrictions on marginalized communities and exposes the systemic racism and classism embedded in abortion legislation.

Furthermore, this thesis examines the intersection of data privacy and reproductive rights, exploring how recent changes in abortion laws have impacted the privacy of women seeking abortion-related services. The study focuses on the potential impact of post-Roe legislation on data privacy, specifically on the surveillance and targeting of women seeking reproductive health resources. The research was conducted using an online survey that targeted women, aged 18 to 40, in Florida, Texas, and Georgia, examining their attitudes towards data privacy, awareness of existing abortion legislation, and access to various reproductive health services. The survey results indicate a disconnect between participants’ expressed concern about data privacy and their actual behavior, which is particularly alarming given the risks women face with changing restrictive abortion laws. Furthermore, the study highlights the lack of awareness and understanding of abortion laws in their respective states. Ultimately, the research stresses the urgent need to address data privacy concerns and provides recommendations for policymakers and technology companies to safeguard the privacy and autonomy of women seeking abortion-related services. To address these findings, I recommend increased education and awareness campaigns to empower women with knowledge about their legal rights and resources for reproductive healthcare services, ensuring that they can make informed decisions about their bodies and their data.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/29287

dc.language.iso

en_US

dc.subject

Data privacy

dc.subject

Reproductive rights

dc.subject

Abortion--Government policy--United States

dc.title

Marginalized and Monitored: Analyzing Reproductive Health and Digital Surveillance in the United States

dc.type

Honors thesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rachel Proudman Public Policy Honors Thesis.pdf
Size:
5.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: