A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

dc.contributor.author

Jelovsek, J Eric

dc.contributor.author

Chagin, Kevin

dc.contributor.author

Brubaker, Linda

dc.contributor.author

Rogers, Rebecca G

dc.contributor.author

Richter, Holly E

dc.contributor.author

Arya, Lily

dc.contributor.author

Barber, Matthew D

dc.contributor.author

Shepherd, Jonathan P

dc.contributor.author

Nolen, Tracy L

dc.contributor.author

Norton, Peggy

dc.contributor.author

Sung, Vivian

dc.contributor.author

Menefee, Shawn

dc.contributor.author

Siddiqui, Nazema

dc.contributor.author

Meikle, Susan F

dc.contributor.author

Kattan, Michael W

dc.contributor.author

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

dc.date.accessioned

2020-01-09T19:58:21Z

dc.date.available

2020-01-09T19:58:21Z

dc.date.issued

2014-02

dc.date.updated

2020-01-09T19:58:21Z

dc.description.abstract

To construct and validate a prediction model for estimating the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after vaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery and compare it with predictions using preoperative urinary stress testing and expert surgeons' predictions.Using the data set (n=457) from the Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Midurethral Sling trial, a model using 12 clinical preoperative predictors of de novo SUI was constructed. De novo SUI was determined by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory responses through 12 months postoperatively. After fitting the multivariable logistic regression model using the best predictors, the model was internally validated with 1,000 bootstrap samples to obtain bias-corrected accuracy using a concordance index. The model's predictions were also externally validated by comparing findings against actual outcomes using Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts trial patients (n=316). The final model's performance was compared with experts using a test data set of 32 randomly chosen Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Midurethral Sling trial patients through comparison of the model's area under the curve against: 1) 22 experts' predictions; and 2) preoperative prolapse reduction stress testing.A model containing seven predictors discriminated between de novo SUI status (concordance index 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.80) in Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Midurethral Sling participants and outperformed expert clinicians (area under the curve 0.72 compared with 0.62, P<.001) and preoperative urinary stress testing (area under the curve 0.72 compared with 0.54, P<.001). The concordance index for Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts trial participants was 0.62 (95% CI 0.56-0.69).This individualized prediction model for de novo SUI after vaginal POP surgery is valid and outperforms preoperative stress testing, prediction by experts, and preoperative reduction cough stress testing. An online calculator is provided for clinical use.III.

dc.identifier.issn

0029-7844

dc.identifier.issn

1873-233X

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/19761

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

dc.relation.ispartof

Obstetrics and gynecology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1097/AOG.0000000000000094

dc.subject

Pelvic Floor Disorders Network

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

dc.subject

Postoperative Complications

dc.subject

Treatment Outcome

dc.subject

Preoperative Care

dc.subject

Logistic Models

dc.subject

Risk Factors

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Suburethral Slings

dc.subject

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

dc.title

A model for predicting the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Jelovsek, J Eric|0000-0002-7196-817X

duke.contributor.orcid

Siddiqui, Nazema|0000-0003-4453-4488

pubs.begin-page

279

pubs.end-page

287

pubs.issue

2 Pt 1

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Urogynecology

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

123

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
00006250-201402000-00009.pdf
Size:
360.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version