Subcapsular Splenic Urinoma and Splenorenal Fistula: A New Complication of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

dc.contributor.author

Cone, Eugene B

dc.contributor.author

Jibara, Ghalib

dc.contributor.author

Wollin, Daniel

dc.contributor.author

Preminger, Glenn M

dc.date.accessioned

2022-08-01T15:38:31Z

dc.date.available

2022-08-01T15:38:31Z

dc.date.issued

2017-01

dc.date.updated

2022-08-01T15:38:31Z

dc.description.abstract

Background: Splenic urinoma has not been previously reported as a complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Case Presentation: A 46-year-old Caucasian male underwent PNL for two large left renal stones. Surgery was performed in prone split-leg position, with access obtained through combined fluoroscopic guidance and direct ureteroscopic observation of the targeted calix. The tract was dilated to 30F using a pressure balloon, and complete clearance of stones was obtained through a combination of rigid and flexible nephroscopy, as well as antegrade ureteroscopy. The patient was left with a Double-J ureteral stent on a string for removal in 1 week. After overnight observation, his hemoglobin, white blood cell count, and renal function were normal and thus he was discharged home. The day after stent removal, he presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, was found to have mild left hydronephrosis on CT, and was discharged on 1 week of antibiotics. One week later he re-presented with worsening abdominal pain and was found to have an elevated creatinine and a white blood cell count of 21 × 109/L. On contrasted CT with delayed images, an 18 cm splenic fluid collection was seen with a fistulous connection to the left kidney collecting system. He underwent emergent stent placement and improved clinically without drainage of the urinoma. A renal ultrasonography 1 month after stent placement confirmed resolution of the splenic urinoma, so the stent was removed at 1 month. Follow-up CT 1 month after stent removal was normal without any evidence of fistula or urinoma recurrence. Conclusion: This is the first report of a subcapsular splenic urinoma and splenorenal fistula post-PNL. Ureteral stent placement was sufficient for drainage and to resolve the complication.

dc.identifier

10.1089/cren.2017.0085

dc.identifier.issn

2379-9889

dc.identifier.issn

2379-9889

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/25546

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Mary Ann Liebert Inc

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of endourology case reports

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1089/cren.2017.0085

dc.subject

kidney trauma

dc.subject

nephrolithiasis

dc.subject

percutaneous nephrolithotomy complication

dc.subject

percutaneous nephrolitothomy

dc.subject

urinoma

dc.subject

urolithiasis

dc.title

Subcapsular Splenic Urinoma and Splenorenal Fistula: A New Complication of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Cone, Eugene B|0000-0002-0292-7534

duke.contributor.orcid

Preminger, Glenn M|0000-0003-4287-602X

pubs.begin-page

134

pubs.end-page

137

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery

pubs.organisational-group

Surgery, Urology

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Subcapsular Splenic Urinoma and Splenorenal Fistula A New Complication of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.pdf
Size:
458.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format