Validation of a Host Gene Expression Test for Bacterial/Viral Discrimination in Immunocompromised Hosts.

dc.contributor.author

Mahle, Rachael E

dc.contributor.author

Suchindran, Sunil

dc.contributor.author

Henao, Ricardo

dc.contributor.author

Steinbrink, Julie M

dc.contributor.author

Burke, Thomas W

dc.contributor.author

McClain, Micah T

dc.contributor.author

Ginsburg, Geoffrey S

dc.contributor.author

Woods, Christopher W

dc.contributor.author

Tsalik, Ephraim L

dc.date.accessioned

2022-02-01T14:48:55Z

dc.date.available

2022-02-01T14:48:55Z

dc.date.issued

2021-08

dc.date.updated

2022-02-01T14:48:47Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Host gene expression has emerged as a complementary strategy to pathogen detection tests for the discrimination of bacterial and viral infection. The impact of immunocompromise on host-response tests remains unknown. We evaluated a host-response test discriminating bacterial, viral, and noninfectious conditions in immunocompromised subjects.

Methods

An 81-gene signature was measured using real-time-polymerase chain reaction in subjects with immunocompromise (chemotherapy, solid-organ transplant, immunomodulatory agents, AIDS) with bacterial infection, viral infection, or noninfectious illness. A regularized logistic regression model trained in immunocompetent subjects was used to estimate the likelihood of each class in immunocompromised subjects.

Results

Accuracy in the 136-subject immunocompetent training cohort was 84.6% for bacterial versus nonbacterial discrimination and 80.8% for viral versus nonviral discrimination. Model validation in 134 immunocompromised subjects showed overall accuracy of 73.9% for bacterial infection (P = .04 relative to immunocompetent subjects) and 75.4% for viral infection (P = .30). A scheme reporting results by quartile improved test utility. The highest probability quartile ruled-in bacterial and viral infection with 91.4% and 84.0% specificity, respectively. The lowest probability quartile ruled-out infection with 90.1% and 96.4% sensitivity for bacterial and viral infection, respectively. Performance was independent of the type or number of immunocompromising conditions.

Conclusions

A host gene expression test discriminated bacterial, viral, and noninfectious etiologies at a lower overall accuracy in immunocompromised patients compared with immunocompetent patients, although this difference was only significant for bacterial infection classification. With modified interpretive criteria, a host-response strategy may offer clinically useful diagnostic information for patients with immunocompromise.
dc.identifier

6104215

dc.identifier.issn

1058-4838

dc.identifier.issn

1537-6591

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/24295

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

dc.relation.ispartof

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1093/cid/ciab043

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

Bacteria

dc.subject

Bacterial Infections

dc.subject

Virus Diseases

dc.subject

Immunocompromised Host

dc.subject

Gene Expression

dc.title

Validation of a Host Gene Expression Test for Bacterial/Viral Discrimination in Immunocompromised Hosts.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Henao, Ricardo|0000-0003-4980-845X

duke.contributor.orcid

Steinbrink, Julie M|0000-0003-0771-3647

duke.contributor.orcid

Burke, Thomas W|0000-0003-0592-5822

duke.contributor.orcid

Ginsburg, Geoffrey S|0000-0003-4739-9808

duke.contributor.orcid

Woods, Christopher W|0000-0001-7240-2453

duke.contributor.orcid

Tsalik, Ephraim L|0000-0002-6417-2042

pubs.begin-page

605

pubs.end-page

613

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

School of Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

Staff

pubs.organisational-group

Nursing

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

pubs.organisational-group

Molecular Genetics and Microbiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Cardiology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, Infectious Diseases

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Cancer Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

73

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BV validation in immunocompromised, CID 2021.pdf
Size:
15.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version