Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review.

dc.contributor.author

Jimenez, Geronimo

dc.contributor.author

Matchar, David

dc.contributor.author

Koh, Gerald Choon-Huat

dc.contributor.author

Car, Josip

dc.date.accessioned

2021-05-03T03:43:08Z

dc.date.available

2021-05-03T03:43:08Z

dc.date.issued

2021-01

dc.date.updated

2021-05-03T03:43:07Z

dc.description.abstract

Background

Many countries have implemented interventions to enhance primary care to strengthen their health systems. These programmes vary widely in features included and their impact on outcomes.

Aim

To identify multiple-feature interventions aimed at enhancing primary care and their effects on measures of system success - that is, population health, healthcare costs and utilisation, patient satisfaction, and provider satisfaction (quadruple-aim outcomes).

Design and setting

Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Method

Electronic, manual, and grey-literature searches were performed for articles describing multicomponent primary care interventions, providing details of their innovation features, relationship to the '4Cs' (first contact, comprehensiveness, coordination, and continuity), and impact on quadruple-aim outcomes. After abstract and full-text screening, articles were selected and their quality appraised. Results were synthesised in a narrative form.

Results

From 37 included articles, most interventions aimed to improve access, enhance incentives for providers, provide team-based care, and introduce technologies. The most consistent improvements related to increased primary care visits and screening/preventive services, and improved patient and provider satisfaction; mixed results were found for hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and expenditures. The available data were not sufficient to link interventions, achievement of the 4Cs, and outcomes.

Conclusion

Most analysed interventions improved some aspects of primary care while, simultaneously, producing non-statistically significant impacts, depending on the features of the interventions, the measured outcome(s), and the populations being studied. A critical research gap was revealed, namely, in terms of which intervention features to enhance primary care (alone or in combination) produce the most consistent benefits.
dc.identifier

bjgp20X714199

dc.identifier.issn

0960-1643

dc.identifier.issn

1478-5242

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22738

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Royal College of General Practitioners

dc.relation.ispartof

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

dc.relation.isversionof

10.3399/bjgp20x714199

dc.subject

chronic disease

dc.subject

health services research

dc.subject

healthcare reform

dc.subject

primary health care

dc.subject

systematic review

dc.title

Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Matchar, David|0000-0003-3020-2108

pubs.begin-page

e10

pubs.end-page

e21

pubs.issue

702

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Pathology

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Provost's Academic Units

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

71

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care a systematic review.pdf
Size:
153.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format