Design and Emergence in the Making of American Grand Strategy
dc.contributor.advisor | Feaver, Peter D | |
dc.contributor.author | Popescu, Ionut | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-14T19:15:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-26T04:30:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.department | Political Science | |
dc.description.abstract | The main research question of this thesis is how do grand strategies form. Grand strategy is defined as a state's coherent and consistent pattern of behavior over a long period of time in search of an overarching goal. The political science literature usually explains the formation of grand strategies by using a planning (or design) model. In this dissertation, I use primary sources, interviews with former government officials, and historical scholarship to show that the formation of grand strategy is better understood using a model of emergent learning imported from the business world. My two case studies examine the formation of American grand strategy during the Cold War and the post-Cold War eras. The dissertation concludes that in both these strategic eras the dominating grand strategies were formed primarily by emergent learning rather than flowing from advanced designs. | |
dc.identifier.uri | ||
dc.subject | Political science | |
dc.subject | Public policy | |
dc.subject | International relations | |
dc.subject | Bush Doctrine | |
dc.subject | Cold War | |
dc.subject | Foreign Policy | |
dc.subject | Grand Strategy | |
dc.subject | National security | |
dc.subject | Strategic planning | |
dc.title | Design and Emergence in the Making of American Grand Strategy | |
dc.type | Dissertation | |
duke.embargo.months | 33 |
Files
Original bundle
- Name:
- Popescu_duke_0066D_12098.pdf
- Size:
- 1.64 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format