Perioperative management of carotid endarterectomy: A survey of clinicians' backgrounds and practices

dc.contributor.author

Greene, Nathaniel H

dc.contributor.author

Minhaj, Mohammed M

dc.contributor.author

Zaky, Ahmed F

dc.contributor.author

Rozet, Irene

dc.date.accessioned

2015-01-22T21:21:15Z

dc.date.issued

2014-01-01

dc.description.abstract

Objective To examine current trends in anesthetic practice for management of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and how practice may differ by groups of practitioners. Design An online survey was sent to the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and Society of Neuroscience, Anesthesiology, and Critical Care e-mail list servers. Responses were voluntary. Setting Academic medical centers and community-based hospitals providing perioperative care for a CEA in the United States and abroad. Participants Anesthesiologists who provide perioperative care for patients undergoing a CEA. Interventions None Measurements and Main Results Of 664 responders (13% response rate), most (66%) had subspecialty training in cardiovascular anesthesiology, had been in practice more than 10 years (68%), and practiced in the United States (US, 81%). About 75% of responders considered general anesthesia as a preferable technique for CA, and about 89% of responders provided it in real life, independent of subspecialty training. The most preferable intraoperative neuromonitoring was cerebral oximetry (28%), followed by EEG (24%), and having an awake patient (23%). Neuroprotection was not considered by 33% of responders, and upon conclusion of a case, 59% preferred an awake patient for extubation, while 15% preferred a deep extubation. Neuroanesthesiologists and non-US responders more often risk stratify patients for perioperative cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, compared with cardiac anesthesiologists and US responders (p = 0.004 and p<0.005, respectively). Additionally, reported management strategies vary substantially from anesthetic practice 20 years ago. Conclusions Although there are areas of perioperative management in which there seems to be agreement for the CEA, there are also areas of divergent practice that could represent potential for improvement in overall outcomes. There are many potential reasons to explain divergence in practice by location or subspecialty training, but it remains unclear what the "best practice" may be. Future studies examining outcomes after carotid endarterectomy should include perioperative anesthetic management strategies to help delineate "best practice." © 2014 Elsevier Inc.

dc.identifier.eissn

1532-8422

dc.identifier.issn

1053-0770

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/9369

dc.publisher

Elsevier BV

dc.relation.ispartof

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1053/j.jvca.2013.11.007

dc.title

Perioperative management of carotid endarterectomy: A survey of clinicians' backgrounds and practices

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Greene, Nathaniel H|0000-0003-0230-0499

pubs.begin-page

1002

pubs.end-page

1005

pubs.issue

4

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology

pubs.organisational-group

Anesthesiology, Pediatrics

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

28

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CEA Survey Published Manuscript.pdf
Size:
151.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format