Outcomes, Expectations, and Complications Overview for the Surgical Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Spinal Deformity

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2012-09-01

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

5
views
5
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

The aim of this article was to summarize current literature on surgical treatment of pediatric and adult spinal deformity with regard to clinical outcomes and surgical complications. When surgery is considered for treatment of spinal deformity, it is important for both the physician and patient to appreciate the outcome objectives, have reasonable expectations, and understand the potential for adverse events. We conducted a comprehensive search of the English literature from the years 2000–2011 using Medline for articles related to the surgical treatment of spinal deformity, using selected terms. We reviewed abstracts and restricted them to those focused on surgical treatment of spinal deformity. We included clinical outcomes measures and overall complications rates, and reviewed corresponding manuscripts. For pediatric and adult spinal deformity, we identified 8 and 17 manuscripts, respectively, that included preoperative and postoperative assessments of outcomes measures. The vast majority of reported studies demonstrated that operative treatment has the potential to produce significant improvement of health-related quality of life. Surgical treatment of pediatric scoliosis, including idiopathic, neuromuscular, and congenital, had reported complication rates ranging from 4.4% to 15.4%, 17.9% to 48.1%, and 8.3% to 31%, respectively. Surgical treatment of adult scoliosis had reported overall complication rates ranging from 10.5% to 96%. The number of high-quality studies that provide assessment of the outcomes of surgery for pediatric and adult scoliosis remains limited; further study is needed. Available studies suggest that in selected patients, surgical treatment offers potential for improvement of health-related quality of life. The current literature also demonstrates the risks that accompany surgical procedures for the correction of spinal deformity. It is important that spinal deformity patients considering surgical treatment have appropriate expectations not only of the potential benefits it may offer, but also of the risks inherent to such procedures.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1016/j.jspd.2012.04.011

Publication Info

Smith, JS, MK Kasliwal, A Crawford and CI Shaffrey (2012). Outcomes, Expectations, and Complications Overview for the Surgical Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Spinal Deformity. Spine Deformity, 1(1). pp. 4–14. 10.1016/j.jspd.2012.04.011 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/28856.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.