Hunting for common ground between wildlife governance and commons scholarship.

dc.contributor.author

Smith, Hillary

dc.contributor.author

Marrocoli, Sergio

dc.contributor.author

Garcia Lozano, Alejandro

dc.contributor.author

Basurto, Xavier

dc.date.accessioned

2019-06-01T15:13:50Z

dc.date.available

2019-06-01T15:13:50Z

dc.date.issued

2019-02

dc.date.updated

2019-06-01T15:13:49Z

dc.description.abstract

Wildlife hunting is essential to livelihoods and food security in many parts of the world, yet present rates of extraction may threaten ecosystems and human communities. Thus, governing sustainable wildlife use is a major social dilemma and conservation challenge. Commons scholarship is well positioned to contribute theoretical insights and analytic tools to better understand the interface of social and ecological dimensions of wildlife governance, yet the intersection of wildlife studies and commons scholarship is not well studied. We reviewed existing wildlife-hunting scholarship, drawing on a database of 1,410 references, to examine the current overlap with commons scholarship through multiple methods, including social network analysis and deductive coding. We found that a very small proportion of wildlife scholarship incorporated commons theories and frameworks. The social network of wildlife scholarship was densely interconnected with several major publication clusters, whereas the wildlife commons scholarship was sparse and isolated. Despite the overarching gap between wildlife and commons scholarship, a few scholars are studying wildlife commons. The small body of scholarship that bridges these disconnected literatures provides valuable insights into the understudied relational dimensions of wildlife and other overlapping common-pool resources. We suggest increased engagement among wildlife and commons scholars and practitioners to improve the state of knowledge and practice of wildlife governance across regions, particularly for bushmeat hunting in the tropics, which is presently understudied through a common-pool resource lens. Our case study of the Republic of Congo showed how the historical context and interrelationships between hunting and forest rights are essential to understanding the current state of wildlife governance and potential for future interventions. A better understanding of the interconnections between wildlife and overlapping common-pool resource systems may be key to understanding present wildlife governance challenges and advancing the common-pool resource research agenda.

dc.identifier.issn

0888-8892

dc.identifier.issn

1523-1739

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/18602

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1111/cobi.13200

dc.subject

análisis de redes sociales

dc.subject

bienes

dc.subject

bushmeat

dc.subject

carne de caza

dc.subject

caza

dc.subject

common pool resource

dc.subject

commons

dc.subject

hunting

dc.subject

instituciones

dc.subject

institutions

dc.subject

recursos comunes

dc.subject

social network analysis

dc.subject

tenencia

dc.subject

tenure

dc.subject

丛林肉

dc.subject

公共资源

dc.subject

公地资源

dc.subject

机构任职

dc.subject

狩猎

dc.subject

社会网络分析

dc.title

Hunting for common ground between wildlife governance and commons scholarship.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Smith, Hillary|0000-0003-1746-6942

duke.contributor.orcid

Basurto, Xavier|0000-0002-5321-3654

pubs.begin-page

9

pubs.end-page

21

pubs.issue

1

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Marine Science and Conservation

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

33

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Smith et al. 2018- Hunting for common ground between wildlife governance and the commons.pdf
Size:
979.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format