Methodological errors in corruption research: Recommendations for future research
Date
2024-03-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Repository Usage Stats
views
downloads
Citation Stats
Abstract
The secretive, illegal, multidimensional, and ubiquitous nature of corruption leads to formidable difficulties in research design and measurement. When research fails to account for these challenges, it can lead to an empirical misalignment with concepts and theories of corruption, with inferential errors commensurately emerging. We define, measure, and track four common measurement errors and two common research design errors for papers on corruption published in international business/management and political economy journals in the 2000–2021 period. Our data marks a substantial opportunity to tighten the fit between theory and methods. We offer recommendations to accelerate improvements in empirical research on corruption, and indeed for other phenomena that are characterized by legal, moral, and social desirability concerns. These empirical recommendations contribute to more robust theory building.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Delios, A, EJ Malesky, S Yu and G Riddler (2024). Methodological errors in corruption research: Recommendations for future research. Journal of International Business Studies, 55(2). pp. 235–251. 10.1057/s41267-023-00637-8 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/30462.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Edmund Malesky
Malesky is a specialist on Southeast Asia, particularly Vietnam. Currently, Malesky's research agenda is very much at the intersection of Comparative and International Political Economy, falling into three major categories: 1) Authoritarian political institutions and their consequences; 2) The political influence of foreign direct investment and multinational corporations; and 3) Political institutions, private business development, and formalization.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.