Is there discordance between achieving the minimal clinically important difference in Neck Disability Index score and patient satisfaction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ 5-year analysis of QOD data.

Abstract

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds are widely used to evaluate outcomes after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), but they may not fully reflect patient satisfaction. The authors hypothesized that discordance exists between MCID achievement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score and satisfaction at long-term follow-up in a minority of patients after surgery for CSM. The 14-site Spine CORe™ study group performed a post hoc analysis of their prospectively collected data from the Quality Outcomes Database, which included 1085 patients who underwent surgery for CSM. Patients with complete baseline and 5-year NDI scores as well as 5-year satisfaction data were included. Satisfaction was assessed using the North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction index, and the MCID was defined for the NDI score. Baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcomes were compared between satisfied and dissatisfied patients within the cohort who met the MCID for NDI score. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of dissatisfaction despite the MCID. In total, 1085 patients underwent surgery for CSM. The 5-year follow-up rate was 82% (106 died within 5 years, and 782 had both 5-year satisfaction and NDI data). At 5 years postoperatively, 497 patients (63.6%) achieved the MCID in NDI score. Among MCID achievers, 463 (93%) were satisfied and 34 (7%) were not satisfied. On univariate analysis, of those who met the MCID, dissatisfied patients were more likely to be current smokers (32.4% vs 15.8%, p = 0.029) and less likely to participate in outside activities (58.8% vs 85.1%, p < 0.001). They also presented with greater baseline disability (NDI score: 47.9 ± 18.2 vs 41.1 ± 19.5, p = 0.021), lower quality of life (EQ-5D score: 0.50 ± 0.19 vs 0.58 ± 0.22, p = 0.029), and lower preoperative functional status (mJOA score: 11.2 ± 2.8 vs 12.3 ± 2.7, p = 0.025) compared with satisfied patients. On multivariate analysis, of those who met the MCID, smoking showed a trend toward higher odds of dissatisfaction (OR 2.12, p = 0.065), while participation in outside activities was protective (OR 0.28, p < 0.001). In this study, only 7% of patients were dissatisfied despite achieving the MCID for NDI score. Participation in outside activities was independently associated with greater satisfaction, whereas smoking showed a trend toward increased dissatisfaction despite meeting the MCID for NDI score. The MCID and satisfaction capture distinct yet complementary aspects of recovery and should be jointly considered during preoperative counseling and postoperative outcome assessment.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Cervical Vertebrae, Humans, Spinal Cord Diseases, Disability Evaluation, Treatment Outcome, Follow-Up Studies, Prospective Studies, Aged, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Female, Male, Spondylosis, Minimal Clinically Important Difference

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.3171/2025.12.focus25946

Publication Info

Alan, Nima, Jay Kumar, Abraham Dada, Mahmoud Elguindy, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, Anthony L Asher, Paul K Kim, et al. (2026). Is there discordance between achieving the minimal clinically important difference in Neck Disability Index score and patient satisfaction after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ 5-year analysis of QOD data. Neurosurgical focus, 60(5). p. E13. 10.3171/2025.12.focus25946 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34630.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.

Gottfried

Oren N Gottfried

Professor of Neurosurgery

I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. I have a special interest in the treatment of thoracolumbar deformities, occipital-cervical problems, and in helping patients with complex spinal issues from previously unsuccessful surgery or recurrent disease.I listen to my patients to understand their symptoms and experiences so I can provide them with the information and education they need to manage their disease. I make sure my patients understand their treatment options, and what will work best for their individual condition. I treat all my patients with care and concern – just as I would treat my family. I am available to address my patients' concerns before and after surgery.  I aim to improve surgical outcomes for my patients and care of all spine patients with active research evaluating clinical and radiological results after spine surgery with multiple prospective databases. I am particularly interested in prevention of spinal deformity, infections, complications, and recurrent spinal disease. Also, I study whether patient specific variables including pelvic/sacral anatomy and sagittal spinal balance predict complications from spine surgery.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.