Incidental Durotomies do not Impact Long-term Neurologic Function After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Abstract

Study design

Retrospective review of multicenter data.

Objective

To compare long-term neurologic recovery in patients with and without incidental durotomy (hereafter, "durotomy") after adult spinal deformity surgery.

Summary of background data

Durotomy is a common complication of adult spinal deformity surgery and is typically associated with technical challenges during the procedure.

Methods

Using a prospectively collected database, we included 1452 patients (73% female; mean age, 60±14 y) who underwent adult spinal deformity surgery from 2008-2020 at 22 US centers. We compared patients with and without durotomy with respect to demographic characteristics, surgical variables, and neurologic outcomes at baseline and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Multivariate analysis compared neurologic complications and length of stay (LOS) between the groups. P<.05 was considered significant.

Results

Durotomy occurred in 121 patients (8.3%). Patients with durotomy were more likely to have undergone revision surgery (P<.001) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index values (P=.029) than those who did not. Patients with durotomy had higher estimated blood loss, longer operative time, more frequent 3-column osteotomies, and longer LOS (all, P<.001). Lower-extremity motor scores did not differ between patients with durotomy and those without at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The incidence of neurologic, medical, and surgical complications did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Patients with durotomy had a higher rate of inpatient return to the operating room (5.0%) than those without (2.0%) (P=.04). On multivariate analysis, there were no differences between groups in lower-extremity motor scores, neurologic complications, or LOS.

Conclusions

Incidental durotomy during adult spinal deformity surgery was associated with greater intraoperative complexity and transient sensory symptoms but did not adversely affect long-term motor recovery, neurologic complications, or patient-reported outcomes. These findings suggest durotomy is a manageable complication without lasting functional consequences.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

International Spine Study Group

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.1097/brs.0000000000005689

Publication Info

Sulieman, Ahmed, Maxwell Sahhar, Indeevar Beeram, Bassel G Diebo, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Breton G Line, D Kojo Hamilton, et al. (2026). Incidental Durotomies do not Impact Long-term Neurologic Function After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine, Publish Ahead of Print. 10.1097/brs.0000000000005689 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34641.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Passias

Peter Passias

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

Throughout my medical career, I have remained dedicated to improving my patients' quality of life. As a specialist in adult cervical and spinal deformity surgery, I understand the significant impact our interventions have on individuals suffering from debilitating pain and physical and mental health challenges. Spinal deformity surgery merges the complexities of spinal biomechanics with the needs of an aging population. My research focuses on spinal alignment, biomechanics, innovative surgical techniques, and health economics to ensure value-based care that enhances patient outcomes.

Shaffrey

Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey

Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery

I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.