PARTAKE survey of public knowledge and perceptions of clinical research in India.

dc.contributor.author

Burt, Tal

dc.contributor.author

Dhillon, Savita

dc.contributor.author

Sharma, Pooja

dc.contributor.author

Khan, Danish

dc.contributor.author

Mv, Deepa

dc.contributor.author

Alam, Sazid

dc.contributor.author

Jain, Sarika

dc.contributor.author

Alapati, Bhavana

dc.contributor.author

Mittal, Sanjay

dc.contributor.author

Singh, Padam

dc.coverage.spatial

United States

dc.date.accessioned

2015-01-15T14:03:52Z

dc.date.issued

2013

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: A public that is an informed partner in clinical research is important for ethical, methodological, and operational reasons. There are indications that the public is unaware or misinformed, and not sufficiently engaged in clinical research but studies on the topic are lacking. PARTAKE - Public Awareness of Research for Therapeutic Advancements through Knowledge and Empowerment is a program aimed at increasing public awareness and partnership in clinical research. The PARTAKE Survey is a component of the program. OBJECTIVE: To study public knowledge and perceptions of clinical research. METHODS: A 40-item questionnaire combining multiple-choice and open-ended questions was administered to 175 English- or Hindi-speaking individuals in 8 public locations representing various socioeconomic strata in New Delhi, India. RESULTS: Interviewees were 18-84 old (mean: 39.6, SD ± 16.6), 23.6% female, 68.6% employed, 7.3% illiterate, 26.3% had heard of research, 2.9% had participated and 58.9% expressed willingness to participate in clinical research. The following perceptions were reported (% true/% false/% not aware): 'research benefits society' (94.1%/3.5%/2.3%), 'the government protects against unethical clinical research' (56.7%/26.3%/16.9%), 'research hospitals provide better care' (67.2%/8.7%/23.9%), 'confidentiality is adequately protected' (54.1%/12.3%/33.5%), 'participation in research is voluntary' (85.3%/5.8%/8.7%); 'participants treated like 'guinea pigs'' (20.7%/53.2%/26.0%), and 'compensation for participation is adequate' (24.7%/12.9%/62.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the Indian public is aware of some key features of clinical research (e.g., purpose, value, voluntary nature of participation), and supports clinical research in general but is unaware of other key features (e.g., compensation, confidentiality, protection of human participants) and exhibits some distrust in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials. Larger, cross-cultural surveys are required to inform educational programs addressing these issues.

dc.identifier

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874712

dc.identifier

PONE-D-13-14775

dc.identifier.eissn

1932-6203

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/9360

dc.language

eng

dc.publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

dc.relation.ispartof

PLoS One

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1371/journal.pone.0068666

dc.subject

Adolescent

dc.subject

Adult

dc.subject

Aged

dc.subject

Aged, 80 and over

dc.subject

Biomedical Research

dc.subject

Female

dc.subject

Humans

dc.subject

India

dc.subject

Male

dc.subject

Middle Aged

dc.subject

Public Opinion

dc.subject

Surveys and Questionnaires

dc.subject

Young Adult

dc.title

PARTAKE survey of public knowledge and perceptions of clinical research in India.

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.author-url

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23874712

pubs.begin-page

e68666

pubs.issue

7

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Faculty

pubs.publication-status

Published online

pubs.volume

8

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PARTAKE survey of public knowledge and perceptions of clinical research in India..pdf
Size:
372.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version