Acceptability and Feasibility of a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Acute Myocardial Infarction Care in Northern Tanzania: the MIMIC Pilot Trial.

dc.contributor.author

Hertz, Julian T

dc.contributor.author

Sakita, Francis M

dc.contributor.author

Haukila, Kelvin F

dc.contributor.author

Shayo, Pankrasi S

dc.contributor.author

Shayo, Frida M

dc.contributor.author

Willy, Joyce

dc.contributor.author

Lameck, Godfrey

dc.contributor.author

Kisanga, Emmanuel

dc.contributor.author

Bosworth, Hayden B

dc.contributor.author

Bettger, Janet P

dc.contributor.author

Rahim, Faraan O

dc.date.accessioned

2026-04-05T20:38:30Z

dc.date.available

2026-04-05T20:38:30Z

dc.date.issued

2024-12-16

dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: The Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Acute Myocardial Infarction Care (MIMIC) was developed to increase uptake of evidence-based care for acute myocardial infarction in Tanzania. MIMIC consists of five components: triage cards, pocket cards, an online training module, patient educational pamphlets, and clinical champions. Our aim was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention among emergency department (ED) providers in Tanzania. METHODS: During a one-year pilot of the MIMIC intervention at the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre in northern Tanzania, ED physicians and nurses were approached and invited to complete a survey eliciting their perspectives on MIMIC. The survey included the four-item Acceptability of Intervention Measurement (AIM) and four-item Feasibility of Intervention Measurement (FIM) tools. Mean AIM and FIM scores were generated by assigning scores of 1-5 for each response (1= strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3= neutral, 4= agree, 5= strongly agree), and dividing by four. RESULTS: Sixty-four participants were enrolled, including 27 (42%) physicians and 37 (58%) nurses. The mean AIM score was 4.82 (sd = 0.31) out of a maximum possible score of 5. The mean FIM score was 4.61 (sd 0.47). Of participants, 63 (98%) reported using the pocket cards and 54 (84%) reported completing the training module, which took a mean of 16.5 (sd 13.3) minutes to complete. Of 36 nurses who worked in triage, all (100%) reported using the MIMIC triage cards. CONCLUSIONS: The MIMIC intervention is highly acceptable and feasible in a northern Tanzanian ED. Use of a co-design approach in the development of the MIMIC intervention likely increased the acceptability and feasibility the intervention to staff. Additional study is needed to determine the effectiveness of this intervention on clinical care processes and patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04563546 ; registered on September 21 st , 2020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04563546.

dc.identifier

2024.12.13.24319026

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34392

dc.language

eng

dc.relation.ispartof

medRxiv

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1101/2024.12.13.24319026

dc.rights.uri

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

dc.title

Acceptability and Feasibility of a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Acute Myocardial Infarction Care in Northern Tanzania: the MIMIC Pilot Trial.

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Hertz, Julian T|0000-0002-7396-4789

duke.contributor.orcid

Bosworth, Hayden B|0000-0001-6188-9825

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

School of Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Basic Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Clinical Science Departments

pubs.organisational-group

Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Medicine, General Internal Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Clinical Research Institute

pubs.organisational-group

University Initiatives & Academic Support Units

pubs.organisational-group

University Institutes and Centers

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Global Health Institute

pubs.organisational-group

Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development

pubs.organisational-group

Duke Science & Society

pubs.organisational-group

Population Health Sciences

pubs.organisational-group

Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Behavioral Medicine & Neurosciences

pubs.organisational-group

Emergency Medicine

pubs.organisational-group

Duke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy

pubs.publication-status

Published online

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0333271.pdf
Size:
276.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format