On the Stability of Moral Judgment Over Time

dc.contributor.advisor

Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter

dc.contributor.author

Rehren, Paul

dc.date.accessioned

2021-01-08T19:50:25Z

dc.date.available

2021-01-08T19:50:25Z

dc.date.issued

2020-11

dc.department

Graduate Liberal Studies

dc.description.abstract

Stability over time is often seen as a signature feature of moral judgment. Yet to date, little focused empirical examination of this assumption exists. In this study, we compare the stability over time of moral judgments about acts in sacrificial dilemmas, moral judgments about the items on the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, and moral judgments about the items on the Morality-as-Cooperation Questionnaire. We find that on three metrics of stability over time, the different types of moral judgment all performed similarly. We also found that changes in moral judgment, when they occurred, could not be easily explained by people changing their mind in light of reasons. We discuss potential implications of our findings for moral psychology and moral philosophy.

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/22036

dc.language.iso

en_US

dc.title

On the Stability of Moral Judgment Over Time

dc.type

Capstone project

duke.embargo.months

0

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GLS Master Project Rehren FINAL.pdf
Size:
310.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: