Enhancing Position Auctions in Retail Media

Loading...

Date

2026

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Attention Stats

Abstract

Retail media, a fast-growing channel for digital advertising, surpassed $55 billion of ad spend in 2024. A common retail media format involves position auctions, in which advertisers bid for higher placements on a retail platform’s product listing page. Advertiser bids are combined with a platform-set quality score to determine the allocation of sponsored slots and the resulting payments. Quality scores boost certain advertisers’ positions and reduce their per-click price. Unlike search engine advertising, retail media position auctions can monetize sales commissions as well as clicks. This paper develops a quality score approach to effectively balance these monetization options.

      To connect quality scores to retail revenues, the paper develops a structural model linking advertiser bids and revenues to the platform’s quality score choices coupled with a machine learning model of consumer behavior. These models are estimated using auction-advertiser level data from a quality score experiment conducted at a mid-size US based retail marketplace. Counterfactual simulations show that a quality score approach that balances clicks and commissions improves platform’s profits by 17% and advertiser surplus by 8% over click-based approaches typically used by retail platforms, leading to a win-win outcome for both.

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Marketing, generalized second price auctions, mechanism design, position effects, quality scores, retail media, sponsored listings

Citation

Citation

Prusty, Siddharth (2026). Enhancing Position Auctions in Retail Media. Dissertation, Duke University. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/35193.

Collections


Except where otherwise noted, student scholarship that was shared on DukeSpace after 2009 is made available to the public under a Creative Commons Attribution / Non-commercial / No derivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND) license. All rights in student work shared on DukeSpace before 2009 remain with the author and/or their designee, whose permission may be required for reuse.