Do patients with government insurance payors experience delayed access to surgical care for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data.
Date
2026-05
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Citation Stats
Attention Stats
Abstract
Insurance status is known to influence access to spine surgery, but its role in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) remains underexplored. The authors hypothesized that government insurance payor status would be associated with delayed care access, evidenced by prolonged symptom duration and greater baseline symptom severity relative to those with private insurance. This was a prospective observational cohort study of 1085 patients enrolled in the Quality Outcomes Database CSM module of the 14-site Spine CORe™ study group. Patients were included if they had complete data for insurance, symptom duration, and baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Insurance status was categorized as private, Medicare, Medicaid, or Veterans Affairs (VA)/federal. Primary outcomes included surrogates of access to care, assessed by symptom duration (> 12 months) and baseline PROs, i.e., the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and EQ-5D. Associations were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. A total of 1085 patients with CSM who underwent surgery were enrolled, with more than 80% completing 5-year follow-up. Patients were excluded if they were uninsured or did not report baseline symptom duration, EQ-5D score, or NDI score, leaving a cohort of 977 patients for analysis. The proportion of patients reporting symptom duration > 12 months differed by insurance status (p < 0.001): highest in VA/federal (18/24, 75%), followed by Medicaid (45/70, 64%), Medicare (206/375, 55%), and private insurance (228/508, 45%). Compared to those who had private insurance, patients covered by VA/federal insurance (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.56-10.89), Medicaid (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.18-3.61), and Medicare (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.39-2.82) had symptom duration > 12 months. Of patients with government insurance payors, Medicaid insurance status was independently associated with worse baseline disability (NDI: β = 7.35, 95% CI 2.35-12.35; p = 0.004) and lower quality of life (EQ-5D: β = -0.12, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.07; p < 0.001). Compared to patients with private insurance, patients covered by government insurance payors (VA/federal insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid) had significantly longer symptom duration before undergoing surgery. Patients with VA/federal insurance coverage had the longest symptom duration of the government payors. Of the government insurance payor types, Medicaid was the only one independently associated with significantly worse baseline disability (NDI) and quality of life (EQ-5D). After controlling for other factors, patients with government insurance coverage, and more specifically Medicaid, have difficulty accessing surgical care in a timely fashion to treat CSM compared to patients with private insurance.
Type
Department
Description
Provenance
Subjects
Citation
Permalink
Published Version (Please cite this version)
Publication Info
Dada, Abraham, Niall Buckley, Satvir Saggi, Anthony DiGiorgio, Jay Kumar, Cheerag D Upadhyaya, Erica F Bisson, Mohamad Bydon, et al. (2026). Do patients with government insurance payors experience delayed access to surgical care for cervical spondylotic myelopathy? A Spine CORe™ analysis of QOD data. Neurosurgical focus, 60(5). p. E9. 10.3171/2025.12.focus25951 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/34640.
This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.
Collections
Scholars@Duke
Christopher Ignatius Shaffrey
I have more than 25 years of experience treating patients of all ages with spinal disorders. I have had an interest in the management of spinal disorders since starting my medical education. I performed residencies in both orthopaedic surgery and neurosurgery to gain a comprehensive understanding of the entire range of spinal disorders. My goal has been to find innovative ways to manage the range of spinal conditions, straightforward to complex. I have a focus on managing patients with complex spinal disorders. My patient evaluation and management philosophy is to provide engaged, compassionate care that focuses on providing the simplest and least aggressive treatment option for a particular condition. In many cases, non-operative treatment options exist to improve a patient’s symptoms. I have been actively engaged in clinical research to find the best ways to manage spinal disorders in order to achieve better results with fewer complications.
Oren N Gottfried
I specialize in the surgical management of all complex cervical, thoracic, lumbar, or sacral spinal diseases by using minimally invasive as well as standard approaches for arthritis or degenerative disease, deformity, tumors, and trauma. I have a special interest in the treatment of thoracolumbar deformities, occipital-cervical problems, and in helping patients with complex spinal issues from previously unsuccessful surgery or recurrent disease.I listen to my patients to understand their symptoms and experiences so I can provide them with the information and education they need to manage their disease. I make sure my patients understand their treatment options, and what will work best for their individual condition. I treat all my patients with care and concern – just as I would treat my family. I am available to address my patients' concerns before and after surgery. I aim to improve surgical outcomes for my patients and care of all spine patients with active research evaluating clinical and radiological results after spine surgery with multiple prospective databases. I am particularly interested in prevention of spinal deformity, infections, complications, and recurrent spinal disease. Also, I study whether patient specific variables including pelvic/sacral anatomy and sagittal spinal balance predict complications from spine surgery.
Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.
