On the (In)Validity of Tests of Simple Mediation: Threats and Solutions

dc.contributor.author

Pek, J

dc.contributor.author

Hoyle, RH

dc.date.accessioned

2017-03-09T18:36:36Z

dc.date.available

2017-03-09T18:36:36Z

dc.date.issued

2016-03-01

dc.description.abstract

Mediation analysis is a popular framework for identifying underlying mechanisms in social psychology. In the context of simple mediation, we review and discuss the implications of three facets of mediation analysis: (a) conceptualization of the relations between the variables, (b) statistical approaches, and (c) relevant elements of design. We also highlight the issue of equivalent models that are inherent in simple mediation. The extent to which results are meaningful stem directly from choices regarding these three facets of mediation analysis. We conclude by discussing how mediation analysis can be better applied to examine causal processes, highlight the limits of simple mediation, and make recommendations for better practice.

dc.identifier.eissn

1751-9004

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/13818

dc.publisher

Wiley

dc.relation.ispartof

Social and Personality Psychology Compass

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1111/spc3.12237

dc.title

On the (In)Validity of Tests of Simple Mediation: Threats and Solutions

dc.type

Journal article

pubs.begin-page

150

pubs.end-page

163

pubs.issue

3

pubs.organisational-group

Center for Child and Family Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Psychology and Neuroscience

pubs.organisational-group

Sanford School of Public Policy

pubs.organisational-group

Trinity College of Arts & Sciences

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

10

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pek & Hoyle (2016).pdf
Size:
360.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version