A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom's grammar

dc.contributor.author

Basurto, X

dc.contributor.author

Kingsley, G

dc.contributor.author

McQueen, K

dc.contributor.author

Smith, M

dc.contributor.author

Weible, CM

dc.date.accessioned

2013-04-15T17:32:33Z

dc.date.issued

2010-10-07

dc.description.abstract

In 1995, Crawford and Ostrom proposed a grammatical syntax for examining institutional statements (i.e., rules, norms, and strategies) as part of the institutional analysis and development framework. This article constitutes the first attempt at applying the grammatical syntax to code institutional statements using two pieces of U.S. legislation. The authors illustrate how the grammatical syntax can serve as a basis for collecting, presenting, and analyzing data in a way that is reliable and conveys valid and substantive meaning for the researcher. The article concludes by describing some implementation challenges and ideas for future theoretical and field research. © 2010 University of Utah.

dc.identifier.issn

1065-9129

dc.identifier.uri

https://hdl.handle.net/10161/6512

dc.publisher

SAGE Publications

dc.relation.ispartof

Political Research Quarterly

dc.relation.isversionof

10.1177/1065912909334430

dc.title

A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom's grammar

dc.type

Journal article

duke.contributor.orcid

Basurto, X|0000-0002-5321-3654

pubs.begin-page

523

pubs.end-page

537

pubs.issue

3

pubs.organisational-group

Duke

pubs.organisational-group

Marine Science and Conservation

pubs.organisational-group

Nicholas School of the Environment

pubs.publication-status

Published

pubs.volume

63

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Political Research Quarterly-2010-Basurt.pdf
Size:
327.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format