The Place of Ibn ʿArabi in the Theologico-Political Thought of Ahmad Fardid

Loading...

Date

2024

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Repository Usage Stats

27
views
15
downloads

Citation Stats

Abstract

Ahmad Fardid (1904/10-1994), a prominent Iranian philosopher, is considered by his followers and detractors to be among the most influential twentieth-century Iranian thinkers and philosophical the-oreticians of the post-revolutionary Islamic regime in Iran, which came to power in 1979. Fardid's intellectual and political legacy has been the subject of much controversy over the past several decades. His thought turns around a radical critique of modernity, humanism, modern science, and democracy, a critique in which Islamic mysticism, especially the thought of Muhyi al-Din Ibn ʿArabi (1165-1240) plays a prominent role. Synthesizing Heidegger's critique of metaphysics with Ibn ʿArabi's mystical system , Fardid developed a philosophy of history illustrating a gradual forgetfulness of Being. This paper aims to explore how Fardid made ideological and political use of Ibn ʿArabi's thought in his criticism and rejection of modern/Western thought and his defense of the Islamic Republic's ideology. We will demonstrate that Fardid's eclectic ideological undertakings significantly reflect his peculiar conception of the historical periods rooted in Ibn ʿArabi's school. 46 Bostani, Namazi Religiographies To cite this: Bostani, Ahmad and Rasoul Namazi. "The Place of Ibn ʿArabi in the Theo-logico-Political Thought of Ahmad Fardid." Religiographies, vol. 3, no. 2 (2024): 46-63. https://doi.org/10.69125/ Religio.2024.v3.n2.46-63.

Department

Description

Provenance

Subjects

Ahmad Fardid, Ibn Al Arabi, Martin Heidegger

Citation

Published Version (Please cite this version)

10.69125/Religio.2024.v3.n2.46-63

Publication Info

Namazi, Rasoul, and Ahmad Bostani (2024). The Place of Ibn ʿArabi in the Theologico-Political Thought of Ahmad Fardid. Religiographies, 3(2). pp. 46–46. 10.69125/Religio.2024.v3.n2.46-63 Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10161/32096.

This is constructed from limited available data and may be imprecise. To cite this article, please review & use the official citation provided by the journal.

Scholars@Duke

Namazi

Rasoul Namazi

Assistant Professor of Political Theory at Duke Kunshan University

Rasoul Namazi's research focuses on the comparative analysis of Islamic and Western political thought. His book, Leo Strauss and Islamic Political Thought (Cambridge University Press, 2022), received the Delba Winthrop Award for Excellence in Political Science and was the subject of a symposium in The Review of Politics. This work offers a comprehensive study of Leo Strauss’s writings on Islamic political thought. He is also the co-editor of Leo Strauss on Religion: Writings and Interpretations (SUNY Press, 2024) and is currently working on a book-length study of early Islamic political thought in the Quran.

Namazi's research has appeared in Comparative Political Theory, Review of Politics, Journal of Religion, Perspectives on Political Science, American Political Thought, Iranian Studies, Interpretation, Renaissance & Reformation, and Eurorient, as well as in several edited volumes.

A laureate of the Prix Raymond Aron, Namazi received his Ph.D. in Political Theory from École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (EHESS). Before joining Duke Kunshan University, he was an Alexander von Humboldt Postdoctoral Fellow at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (2019–2021) and a Postdoctoral Scholar at the Committee on Social Thought, University of Chicago (2016–2018).


Unless otherwise indicated, scholarly articles published by Duke faculty members are made available here with a CC-BY-NC (Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial) license, as enabled by the Duke Open Access Policy. If you wish to use the materials in ways not already permitted under CC-BY-NC, please consult the copyright owner. Other materials are made available here through the author’s grant of a non-exclusive license to make their work openly accessible.